§Why CasetextPricing

Lindsay Lohan, Appellant,v.Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Brief

29 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.

    529 U.S. 803 (2000)   Cited 829 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a statute was content based because it “applies only to channels primarily dedicated to sexually explicit adult programming or other programming that is indecent”

  2. Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Assn.

    564 U.S. 786 (2011)   Cited 487 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that even if violent video games cause aggression, a state could not prohibit their sale to children

  3. Dombrowski v. Pfister

    380 U.S. 479 (1965)   Cited 1,773 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding unconstitutional an "overly broad statute" because it "creates a ‘danger zone’ within which protected expression may be inhibited"

  4. Time, Inc. v. Hill

    385 U.S. 374 (1967)   Cited 713 times
    Holding constitutional a state law imposing civil liability for malicious false statements that invade a private individual's right of privacy

  5. Winters v. New York

    333 U.S. 507 (1948)   Cited 882 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a statute imposes criminal penalties, the standard of certainty involved in vagueness review is higher

  6. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson

    343 U.S. 495 (1952)   Cited 628 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that movies are a protected form of speech

  7. Arrington v. N Y Times Co.

    55 N.Y.2d 433 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 324 times
    Finding the newsworthiness exception met when defendant published an article on the expanding black middle class featuring the plaintiff's image even though plaintiff had no prior knowledge that his photograph had been taken

  8. Groden v. Random House, Inc.

    61 F.3d 1045 (2d Cir. 1995)   Cited 215 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding district court properly converted motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim into summary judgment motion where nonmoving party had sufficient notice motion might be converted given motion alternatively sought summary judgment, and nonmoving party had opportunity to, and did, present evidence outside the pleadings

  9. Messenger v. Gruner + Jahr Printing & Publishing

    94 N.Y.2d 436 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 124 times
    Holding that no appropriation claim may lie where “plaintiff's photograph is used to illustrate a newsworthy article”

  10. Wash. Post Co. v. Keogh

    365 F.2d 965 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 262 times
    Holding summary disposition of case essential "[f]or the stake here, if harassment succeeds, is public debate."

  11. Section 500.23 - Amicus curiae relief

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.23   Cited 3 times

    Any non-party other than the Attorney General seeking to file an amicus brief on an appeal, certified question or motion for leave to appeal must obtain permission by motion. Potential amici seeking information are encouraged to contact the clerk's office by telephone during business hours. Information on the calendar status of appeals and certified questions, court session dates and appropriate return dates for amicus motions also is available on the court's website. (a)Motions for amicus curiae