§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Anthony Parson, Jr., Appellant.

Brief

15 Cited authorities

  1. Whren v. United States

    517 U.S. 806 (1996)   Cited 8,621 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, upon observing traffic violation, officer may stop vehicle regardless of his subjective motivations, "as long as the circumstances, viewed objectively, justify that action"

  2. People v. Rivera

    71 N.Y.2d 705 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 1,832 times
    Holding petitioner who failed to show "the absence of strategic or other legitimate explanations" for counsels' alleged shortcoming did not have viable claim to constitutionally ineffective counsel

  3. People v. Ford

    86 N.Y.2d 397 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 1,246 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Ford, the court held that due process requires that the record must be clear that the plea represents a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action open to the defendant.

  4. People v. Turner

    2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 8766 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 523 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Finding appellate counsel ineffective for not raising ineffectiveness of trial counsel on appeal

  5. People v. Robinson

    97 N.Y.2d 341 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 494 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Declining to distinguish between criminal and traffic violations for the purposes of searches and seizures under New York law

  6. People v. Hansen

    95 N.Y.2d 227 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 444 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, by pleading guilty, the defendant had forfeited his right to challenge the prosecutor's submission of hearsay evidence to the grand jury

  7. People v. Taylor

    65 N.Y.2d 1 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 348 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Argued March 21, 1985 Decided April 30, 1985 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Donald H. Monroe, J. Samuel J. Castellino, Public Defender ( William J. Lodico of counsel), for appellant. James T. Hayden, District Attorney, for respondent. KAYE, J. By pleading guilty, a defendant forfeits his right to seek reversal of his conviction on the ground that identification testimony or evidence of prior statements is inadmissible because the prosecution

  8. People v. Petgen

    55 N.Y.2d 529 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 146 times
    In Petgen, we found that, as a result of his guilty plea, defendant forfeited his claim that counsel was ineffective where new counsel represented the defendant at the plea, and was aware of the prior attorney's asserted ineffectiveness.

  9. People v. Cuffie

    109 A.D.3d 1200 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 56 times

    2013-09-27 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Victor CUFFIE, Defendant–Appellant. Peter J. Glennon, Rochester, for Defendant–Appellant. Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Matthew Dunham of Counsel), for Respondent. Peter J. Glennon, Rochester, for Defendant–Appellant. Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Matthew Dunham of Counsel), for Respondent. PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ. MEMORANDUM: [1] Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting

  10. People v. Michael Brunner

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 2483 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 37 times
    In People v Brunner (16 NY3d 820 [2011]), a case where defense counsel failed to file a CPL 30.30 motion entirely, we held that defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim failed as there was "nothing clear cut about his CPL 30.30 claim" and "the governing law was unfavorable" (16 NY3d at 821).