§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of City of Yonkers, Respondent,v.Yonkers Fire Fighters, Local 628, IAFF, AFL-CIO, Appellant.

Brief

12 Cited authorities

  1. Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.

    363 U.S. 574 (1960)   Cited 5,550 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”

  2. Steelworkers v. Enterprise Corp.

    363 U.S. 593 (1960)   Cited 3,861 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator

  3. Matter of Sprinzen

    46 N.Y.2d 623 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 394 times
    Approving arbitrator's award enforcing restrictive employment covenant

  4. In re N.Y.C. Transit Auth. v. Transport Workers U

    99 N.Y.2d 1 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 136 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "although the awards directed reinstatement of the employees, they clearly did not disregard safety concerns and the seriousness of the breaches of safety rules. Instead, they imposed serious financial sanctions in both cases"

  5. Bingham v. New York City Transit Auth.

    99 N.Y.2d 355 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 75 times

    13 Argued January 14, 2003. Decided February 20, 2003. APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered October 30, 2001, which affirmed an order of the Supreme Court (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered in New York County, granting a motion by defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Constantine P. Kokkoris, for appellant. Lawrence Heisler, for respondents. Judges Smith, Ciparick, Wesley

  6. Bd. of Educ., Huntington v. Teachers

    30 N.Y.2d 122 (N.Y. 1972)   Cited 149 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Huntington, we held that a lumpsum retirement incentive was not a feature of a "retirement system", which section 113 of the Retirement and Social Security Law forbade the municipality to create, because it was compensation for services actually rendered.

  7. Board of Educ. of Yonkers

    40 N.Y.2d 268 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Declaring public policy does not prevent public employer from agreeing to set size of work force during term of agreement

  8. Port Washington Union Free Sch. Dist v. Port Washington Teachers Ass'n

    45 N.Y.2d 411 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 89 times
    In Matter of Port Washington Union Free School Dist. v. Port Washington Teachers Assn. (45 N.Y.2d 411, 418), decided shortly after the judgment herein was entered, the Court of Appeals explicitly rejected the notion that arbitration in a dispute between a public school district and a teachers organization should be stayed merely because the requested remedy, if granted, might result in an impermissible delegation of the board of education's supervisory responsibility under the Education Law.

  9. Reporters Assn. v. N Y State

    79 N.Y.2d 39 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 42 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding unanimously that a 1991 statute deferring state employees' salary payments was not "reasonable and necessary to accomplish the State's purposes"

  10. Matter of Board of Educ

    49 N.Y.2d 145 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 34 times

    Argued November 20, 1979 Decided December 19, 1979 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, D. VINCENT CERRITO, J. Dennis G. O'Hara and Michael J. Kawa for appellant. Richard E. Casagrande, Bernard F. Ashe and J. Michael Eadry for respondents. FUCHSBERG, J. In a proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR 7511, the Appellate Division reversed an order of Special Term vacating an arbitration award which, inter alia, had ordered a school district to reinstate