§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Douglas R. Every, Appellant.

Brief

17 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Ashwal

    39 N.Y.2d 105 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 1,144 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Ashwal, the New York Court of Appeals cited Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78, 55 S. Ct. 629 (1935), to support the proposition that "[a]bove all [the prosecutor] should not seek to lead the jury away from the issues by drawing irrelevant and inflammatory conclusions which have a decided tendency to prejudice the jury against the defendant."

  2. People v. Thomas

    50 N.Y.2d 467 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 468 times
    Reversing Appellate Division

  3. People v. Miller

    39 N.Y.2d 543 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 188 times
    Authorizing admission of "evidence of the victim's prior specific acts of violence of which the defendant had knowledge"

  4. Matter of Y.K

    87 N.Y.2d 430 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 106 times
    Holding that the duty to retreat does "not arise until the point at which deadly physical force was used or imminent."

  5. People v. Woodard

    83 A.D.3d 1440 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 24 times

    No. KA 04-01470. April 1, 2011. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Stephen R. Sir kin, A.J.), rendered April 15, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of burglary in the first degree (two counts), assault in the second degree, assault in the third degree (four counts) and unlawful imprisonment in the first degree (two counts). KRISTIN F. SPLAIN, CONFLICT DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (KELLEY PROVO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. MICHAEL C. GREEN, DISTRICT

  6. People v. Bradley

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7858 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 18 times

    2012-11-20 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Dale BRADLEY, Appellant. Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (Kimberly F. Duguay of counsel), for appellant. Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Leslie E. Swift of counsel), for respondent. Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (Kimberly F. Duguay of counsel), for appellant. Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Leslie E. Swift of counsel), for respondent. OPINION OF THE COURT Chief Judge LIPPMAN

  7. People v. Morgan

    99 A.D.3d 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 6 times

    2012-10-25 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Simone MORGAN, Defendant–Appellant. Stanley Neustadter, Cardozo Appeals Clinic, New York (Bobbie Sternheim of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Naomi C. Reed of counsel), for respondent. GONZALEZ Stanley Neustadter, Cardozo Appeals Clinic, New York (Bobbie Sternheim of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Naomi C. Reed of counsel), for respondent. GONZALEZ

  8. People v. Greene

    72 A.D.3d 1279 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 6 times
    Upholding convictions for assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree where the defendant used a "barbecue fork" against the victim

  9. People v. Thomas

    111 A.D.3d 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 2 times

    2013-11-26 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Roger THOMAS, Defendant–Appellant. Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Kerry S. Jamieson of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Dana Poole of counsel), for respondent. ANDRIAS Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Kerry S. Jamieson of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Dana Poole of counsel), for respondent

  10. People v. Fore

    33 A.D.3d 932 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 7 times

    No. 2003-00119. October 24, 2006. Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Brown, J.), rendered December 11, 2002, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Before: Miller, J.P., Crane, Santucci and Luciano, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. At trial, the defendant presented a justification