§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Joseph Conceicao, Appellant.

Brief

9 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Kalin

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2446 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 687 times
    In Kalin, 12 N.Y.3d 225, 878 N.Y.S.2d 653, 906 N.E.2d 381, the Court of Appeals examined an information which had charged the defendant with, among other things, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree for the possession of nine plastic bags of heroin.

  2. People v. Harris

    61 N.Y.2d 9 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 1,659 times
    In People v Harris (61 N.Y.2d 9), within the context of determining whether a guilty plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered, the Court of Appeals concluded that no mandatory catechism was required.

  3. People v. Alexander

    97 N.Y.2d 482 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 266 times
    In Alexander, the defendant, while awaiting sentence, moved to withdraw his guilty plea, claiming he was not competent when he entered it.

  4. Hanson v. Phillips

    442 F.3d 789 (2d Cir. 2006)   Cited 56 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Sentencing court's "confusing mixture of questions and statements" created too messy a record to determine whether the petitioner was pleading voluntarily

  5. Willbright v. Smith

    745 F.2d 779 (2d Cir. 1984)   Cited 66 times
    Holding that factual basis inquiry is "one way of satisfying the constitutional requirement that a [guilty] plea be voluntary and intelligent," but it is "not mandate[d]" by due process

  6. Kloner v. United States

    535 F.2d 730 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 35 times
    Upholding a guilty plea despite the trial court's failure to enumerate specific constitutional rights during its Rule 11 plea canvass

  7. People v. Moore

    91 A.D.2d 1050 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)   Cited 25 times

    January 24, 1983 Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tsoucalas, J.), both rendered March 20, 1978, each convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his guilty plea, and imposing sentence. Judgments affirmed. The defendant did not seek to withdraw his pleas of guilty to robbery in the first degree prior to or at the time of sentencing. Thus he did not, as a matter of law, preserve his claim that his allocution at the time of his plea was insufficient

  8. People v. Benjamin

    19 Misc. 3d 1133 (N.Y. Crim. Ct. 2008)

    May 12, 2008. Mandelbaum, J. Crimes-Plea of Guilty.

  9. PEOPLE v. YU

    8 Misc. 3d 128 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)   Cited 2 times

    June 24, 2005. Crimes — Plea of Guilty.