§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of City of Schenectady, Appellant,v.New York State Public Employment Relations Board et al., Respondents.

Brief

25 Cited authorities

  1. Matter of Scherbyn v. Boces

    77 N.Y.2d 753 (N.Y. 1991)   Cited 530 times
    Finding that Article 78 review of a quasi-judicial hearing is a certiorari proceeding, not a mandamus to review proceeding, and therefore "substantial evidence" rather than "arbitrary and capricious" is the standard of review

  2. Amorosi v. South Colonie Independent Central School District

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9904 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 114 times
    Holding that "the one-year limitation prescribed in Education Law § 3813(2-b) should govern discrimination claims against a school district"

  3. Scanlan v. Buffalo School

    90 N.Y.2d 662 (N.Y. 1997)   Cited 107 times
    In Matter of Scanlan v Buffalo Pub. School Sys. (90 NY2d 662), the Court of Appeals wrestled with the issue of whether four teachers could obtain retroactive membership in the New York State Teachers' Retirement System (TRS), based upon periods they spent as part-time or substitute teachers in the school districts.

  4. B F Bldg. Corp. v. Liebig

    76 N.Y.2d 689 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 123 times
    In B F Bldg. Corp. v. Liebig (76 N.Y.2d 689) and in Mortise v. 55 Liberty Owners Corp. (63 N.Y.2d 743, affd forreasons stated at 102 A.D.2d 719), the Court of Appeals held that home improvement contractors who had not secured the license required by a local New York City law were not entitled to recover damages for breach of contract.

  5. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of City of New York, Inc. v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2288 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 62 times
    Noting that "the application of the Taylor Law to particular facts [is] an area in which PERB is entitled to deference"

  6. Matter of City of Watertown

    95 N.Y.2d 73 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 57 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that "absent clear evidence that the Legislature intended otherwise, the presumption is that all terms and conditions of employment are subject to mandatory bargaining"

  7. Town of Wallkill v. Civil Serv. Emps. Ass'n, Inc.

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7146 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that although Wallkill has been bargaining over discipline for 12 years, it is a prohibited subject

  8. N.Y. State Office of Victim Servs. ex rel. Balogh v. Raucci

    97 A.D.3d 235 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 11 times

    2012-06-7 In the Matter of NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF VICTIM SERVICES, on Behalf of Laura BALOGH et al., Appellant, v. Steven C. RAUCCI, Respondent. Shelley Raucci, Nonparty Respondent. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Owen W. DeMuth of counsel), for appellant. Frank M. Putorti Jr., P.C., Schenectady (Frank M. Putorti Jr. of counsel), for Shelley Raucci, respondent. MERCURE Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Owen W. DeMuth of counsel), for appellant. Frank M. Putorti Jr

  9. Newark Valley Central School District v. Public Employment Relations Board

    83 N.Y.2d 315 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 30 times
    Holding that issue of whether a school district's duty to negotiate a smoking policy was preempted by statute or policy is a question of law that must be independently examined by courts

  10. In the Matter of Correll v. Bucci

    19 A.D.3d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)   Cited 10 times

    97342. June 23, 2005. Lahtinen, J. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Broome County) to review a determination of respondent Richard A. Bucci which terminated petitioner's employment. Hinman, Howard Kattell L.L.P., Binghamton (Jon S. Blechman of counsel), for petitioner. Gregory J. Poland, Corporation Counsel, Binghamton, for respondents. Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Petitioner was appointed to a