§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of the Arbitration between the City of Oswego, Appellant, -and- Oswego City Firefighters Association, Local 2707, Respondent.

Brief

22 Cited authorities

  1. N.Y. State Corr. Officers & Police Benevolent Ass'n v. New York

    94 N.Y.2d 321 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 328 times
    Affirming arbitration award reinstating employee to his position as correctional officer, with full pay, notwithstanding the employee's having flown a Nazi flag on the porch of his home

  2. Muschany v. United States

    324 U.S. 49 (1945)   Cited 308 times
    In Muschany, the Supreme Court based the public policy exception on "definite indications in the law of the sovereignty," 324 U.S. at 66, 65 S.Ct. at 451 — not just on "definite laws," as Schott's Union argues.

  3. In Matter of Chautauqua v. Civil Ser. Emp. Assn.

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 3756 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 75 times

    No. 55. Argued March 22, 2007. Decided May 1, 2007. APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, entered February 3, 2006. The Appellate Division (1) reversed, on the law, insofar as appealed from, an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75, which had granted in part the petition to stay arbitration and stayed arbitration

  4. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of City of New York, Inc. v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2288 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 62 times
    Noting that "the application of the Taylor Law to particular facts [is] an area in which PERB is entitled to deference"

  5. In re Dutchess County Dept. of Social Ser., v. Day

    96 N.Y.2d 149 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 62 times

    Decided May 3, 2001. Appeal, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, entered February 28, 2000, which affirmed an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Damian J. Amodeo, J.), denying objections to two orders of that Family Court (Esther R. Furman, H.E.) that directed respondents to pay a total of $4,375 as reimbursement to petitioner for money it expended on behalf of respondents' minor child while

  6. Board of Education of City School District v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

    75 N.Y.2d 660 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 65 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "in a few instances, however, what might otherwise be negotiable terms and conditions of employment are prohibited from being collectively bargained. For example, a statute may direct that certain action be taken by the employer, leaving no room for negotiation."

  7. Professional Staff Congress-City University v. New York State Public Employment Relations Board

    7 N.Y.3d 458 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 31 times

    No. 91. Argued September 6, 2006. Decided October 17, 2006. APPEALS, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered June 7, 2005, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division by order of the Supreme Court, entered in New York County). The Appellate Division granted the petition to set aside a determination of respondent New York State Public Employment Relations Board

  8. In re Niagara County

    82 A.D.3d 1597 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 21 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. CA 10-00262. March 25, 2011. Appeals, by permission of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered December 28, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The order denied the motions of respondents to dismiss the amended petition pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (3) and (7) and granted petitioners' motion for leave to serve a complaint and discovery demands. TERRY L. BROWN

  9. Reporters Assn. v. N Y State

    79 N.Y.2d 39 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 42 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding unanimously that a 1991 statute deferring state employees' salary payments was not "reasonable and necessary to accomplish the State's purposes"

  10. People v. Mitchell

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 5245 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 17 times

    No. 114. Argued May 6, 2010. decided June 15, 2010. APPEAL, by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, entered May 7, 2009. The Appellate Division affirmed an order of the Essex County Court (Richard B. Meyer, J.), which had denied defendant's motion, pursuant to CPL 440.10 and 440.20, to vacate the judgment convicting him of driving while intoxicated and aggravated unlicensed operation