30 Cited authorities

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (1984) Cited 158,786 times 176 Legal Analyses
Holding an "error by counsel" doesn't "warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal proceeding" where in the context of the whole proceeding the identified error "had no effect on the judgment"
Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (2010) Cited 8,611 times 131 Legal Analyses
Holding that counsel has a duty under the Sixth Amendment to inform a noncitizen defendant that his plea would make him eligible for deportation
Hill v. Lockhart
474 U.S. 52 (1985) Cited 20,006 times 34 Legal Analyses
Holding that a Strickland claim can be brought to challenge a guilty plea, but rejecting the claim at issue
Boykin v. Alabama
395 U.S. 238 (1969) Cited 13,227 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding that a silent record is insufficient for a waiver of certain specified rights not at issue here
North Carolina v. Alford
400 U.S. 25 (1970) Cited 10,649 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that an individual may "consent to the imposition of a prison sentence" despite maintaining that he is innocent of the charged crime
Brady v. United States
397 U.S. 742 (1970) Cited 7,311 times 17 Legal Analyses
Holding that a defendant who pled guilty to federal kidnapping could not impugn the propriety of his plea under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 based on a later development striking down the death penalty for that offense
People v. Benevento
91 N.Y.2d 708 (N.Y. 1998) Cited 4,215 times 2 Legal Analyses
In People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-14 (1998), the New York Court of Appeals held that "meaningful representation" included a prejudice component which focuses on the "fairness of the process as a whole rather than [any] particular impact on the outcome of the case."
People v. Baldi
54 N.Y.2d 137 (N.Y. 1981) Cited 5,975 times 6 Legal Analyses
In Baldi, the New York State Court of Appeals expressly applied the right to effective assistance of counsel guaranteed by the federal Constitution.
People v. Lopez
71 N.Y.2d 662 (N.Y. 1988) Cited 2,855 times 3 Legal Analyses
In Lopez, the New York Court of Appeals recognized "the rare case" where a defendant's plea allocution "casts significant doubt upon the defendant's guilt or otherwise calls into question the voluntariness of the plea[.]"
People v. Peque
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7651 (N.Y. 2013) Cited 624 times
Holding that New York trial courts must inform the defendant of the immigration consequences of pleading guilty to a felony and that a failure to do so could provide a basis for withdrawing or vacating the guilty plea

The People, Respondent,v.Tyrone D. Manor, Appellant.

30 Cited authorities

Holding an "error by counsel" doesn't "warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal proceeding" where in the context of the whole proceeding the identified error "had no effect on the judgment"

Holding that counsel has a duty under the Sixth Amendment to inform a noncitizen defendant that his plea would make him eligible for deportation

Holding that a Strickland claim can be brought to challenge a guilty plea, but rejecting the claim at issue

Holding that a silent record is insufficient for a waiver of certain specified rights not at issue here

Holding that an individual may "consent to the imposition of a prison sentence" despite maintaining that he is innocent of the charged crime

Holding that a defendant who pled guilty to federal kidnapping could not impugn the propriety of his plea under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 based on a later development striking down the death penalty for that offense

In People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-14 (1998), the New York Court of Appeals held that "meaningful representation" included a prejudice component which focuses on the "fairness of the process as a whole rather than [any] particular impact on the outcome of the case."

In Baldi, the New York State Court of Appeals expressly applied the right to effective assistance of counsel guaranteed by the federal Constitution.

In Lopez, the New York Court of Appeals recognized "the rare case" where a defendant's plea allocution "casts significant doubt upon the defendant's guilt or otherwise calls into question the voluntariness of the plea[.]"

Holding that New York trial courts must inform the defendant of the immigration consequences of pleading guilty to a felony and that a failure to do so could provide a basis for withdrawing or vacating the guilty plea