§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Respondent,v.Josefina Jimenez, Appellant.

Brief

84 Cited authorities

  1. Arizona v. Gant

    556 U.S. 332 (2009)   Cited 3,891 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Fourth Amendment does not permit officers to search every vehicle incident to arrest

  2. Davis v. U.S.

    564 U.S. 229 (2011)   Cited 2,233 times   47 Legal Analyses
    Holding "newly announced rules of constitutional criminal procedure 'must apply retroactively to all cases, state or federal, pending on direct review or not yet final, with no exception.'"

  3. Dunaway v. New York

    442 U.S. 200 (1979)   Cited 3,723 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that seizing and transporting a suspect to a police station for interrogation without probable cause violated the Fourth Amendment

  4. Chimel v. California

    395 U.S. 752 (1969)   Cited 5,661 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, absent a search warrant, there is "no . . . justification" for searching an area not within a suspect's immediate control during an arrest

  5. New York v. Belton

    453 U.S. 454 (1981)   Cited 3,125 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when an officer has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile, he may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the interior of that automobile

  6. Mapp v. Ohio

    367 U.S. 643 (1961)   Cited 8,294 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the exclusionary rule under the Fourth Amendment applies to the States, and overruling the contrary rule of Wolf v. Colorado , 338 U.S. 25, 69 S.Ct. 1359, 93 L.Ed. 1782, after considering and rejecting "the current validity of the factual grounds upon which Wolf was based"

  7. United States v. Robinson

    414 U.S. 218 (1973)   Cited 3,360 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that law enforcement officers are authorized to conduct a full search of every lawful custodial arrestee

  8. Sibron v. New York

    392 U.S. 40 (1968)   Cited 3,595 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that appeal from conviction after service of sentence not moot if there may be collateral consequences

  9. United States v. Chadwick

    433 U.S. 1 (1977)   Cited 1,948 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that evidence obtained from search conducted ninety minutes after arrest must be suppressed because "no exigency" justified the search as incident to the arrest

  10. People v. De Bour

    40 N.Y.2d 210 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 2,271 times   6 Legal Analyses
    In People v. LaPene, 352 N.E.2d 562 (N.Y. 1976), the New York Court of Appeals laid out a sliding scale of justifiable police intrusion, short of probable cause to arrest, which specified three distinct levels of intrusion correlating the allowable intensity of police conduct to the nature and weight of the facts precipitating the intrusion.