20 Cited authorities

  1. Payton v. New York

    445 U.S. 573 (1980)   Cited 6,829 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a New York statute “authoriz[ing] police officers to enter a private residence without a warrant and with force, if necessary, to make a routine felony arrest” was “not consistent with the Fourth Amendment”
  2. United States v. Jones

    565 U.S. 400 (2012)   Cited 1,447 times   106 Legal Analyses
    Holding that attaching a GPS device to a suspect’s car constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment
  3. New Jersey v. T. L. O

    469 U.S. 325 (1985)   Cited 1,795 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Fourth Amendment applies to searches and seizures conducted by public-school officials, establishing the standard for finding a violation, but concluding that the claim at issue failed
  4. O'Connor v. Ortega

    480 U.S. 709 (1987)   Cited 872 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring a warrant for government employers’ work-related searches of employees’ workspaces "would seriously disrupt the routine conduct of business and would be unreasonable"
  5. City of Ontario v. Quon

    560 U.S. 746 (2010)   Cited 277 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the police department's warrantless search of a police officer's pager was reasonable because it was not excessive in scope and was motivated by a legitimate work-related purpose
  6. In re of an Investigation into the Death of Jon L.

    56 N.Y.2d 288 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 238 times
    Upholding court order that a suspect in a homicide investigation produce a blood sample
  7. People v. Weaver

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3762 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 106 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding use of GPS device to track suspect for 65 days was search
  8. Delia v. City of Rialto

    621 F.3d 1069 (9th Cir. 2010)   Cited 88 times
    Holding that clearly established law did not put defendants on notice that a direct order "with no attendant threat to . . . employment" would invalidate consent
  9. Bingham v. New York City Transit Auth.

    99 N.Y.2d 355 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 60 times

    13 Argued January 14, 2003. Decided February 20, 2003. APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered October 30, 2001, which affirmed an order of the Supreme Court (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered in New York County, granting a motion by defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Constantine P. Kokkoris, for appellant. Lawrence Heisler, for respondents. Judges Smith, Ciparick, Wesley

  10. Patchogue-Medford Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education of Patchogue-Medford Union Free School District

    510 N.E.2d 325 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 82 times
    Finding that teachers are not pervasively regulated