§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Ericka Bolt, Respondent,v.New York City Department of Education, Appellant.

Brief

20 Cited authorities

  1. Pell v. Board of Education

    34 N.Y.2d 222 (N.Y. 1974)   Cited 5,554 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Discussing the standard of review in an Article 78 appeal

  2. Lackow v. Department of Education

    51 A.D.3d 563 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 263 times
    Deciding Article 75 petition to vacate a § 3020-a hearing decision

  3. Ambach v. Norwick

    441 U.S. 68 (1979)   Cited 153 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding constitutional a New York law requiring public schoolteachers to be citizens

  4. City Sch. Dist. of the New York v. McGraham

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8228 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 107 times

    2011-11-17 CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT OF the CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. Colleen McGRAHAM, Respondent. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Stephen J. McGrath, Cheryl Payer and Leonard Koerner of counsel), for appellant. Maria Elena Gonzalez, New York City, and Richard E. Casagrande for respondent. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Stephen J. McGrath, Cheryl Payer and Leonard Koerner of counsel), for appellant. Maria Elena Gonzalez, New York City, and Richard

  5. Cipollaro v. New York City Department of Education

    83 A.D.3d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 32 times
    In Cipollaro v New York City Dept. of Educ., 83 AD3d 543 (1st Dep't. 2011), a teacher's termination was upheld because the Hearing Officer found that the teacher had "knowingly defrauded respondent of $98,000 over a two-year period by enrolling two of her children in New York City public schools when she and her family lived in Westchester County..."

  6. Schaubman v. Blum

    49 N.Y.2d 375 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 73 times
    Referring to DSS-provider relationship as "contractual" in nature

  7. Russo v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

    2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 2870 (N.Y. 2015)   Cited 15 times
    Reversing First Department remand to Hearing Officer for re-determination of less severe penalty and, instead, upholding termination where teacher was found guilty of incompetence and failure to manage his special education class for three school years

  8. In re Beverly Riley

    84 A.D.3d 442 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 16 times
    In Riley, also a case involving corporal punishment, the Hearing Officer on remand had directed a punishment of a one year-suspension, which had then received judicial approval.

  9. In the Matter of Diefenthaler v. Klein

    27 A.D.3d 347 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 21 times

    7935. March 23, 2006. Determinations of respondent Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, dated April 8, 2004, which, based upon findings of an Administrative Law Judge, sustained certain specifications of misconduct against petitioners, rejected the Administrative Law Judge's recommendation to suspend each petitioner for 25 days without pay, and instead ordered the immediate termination of petitioners' employment, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent that the penalty

  10. Beatty v. City of N.Y.

    148 A.D.3d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)   Cited 2 times

    03-02-2017 In re Amira BEATTY, Petitioner–Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Respondents–Respondents. Glass Krakower LLP, New York (Bryan D. Glass of counsel), for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Richard Dearing of counsel), for respondents. Glass Krakower LLP, New York (Bryan D. Glass of counsel), for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Richard Dearing of counsel), for respondents. FRIEDMAN, J.P., ANDRIAS, MOSKOWITZ, KAPNICK, KAHN, JJ. Order