§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Mehran Manouel, et al., Appellants,v.Board of Assessors, et al., Respondents.

Brief

12 Cited authorities

  1. Andros Compania Maritima v. Marc Rich Co.

    579 F.2d 691 (2d Cir. 1978)   Cited 415 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Denying motion to vacate award because arbitrator only failed to disclose "professional" relationships that did not create even an "impression of possible bias."

  2. Great Eastern Mall v. Condon

    36 N.Y.2d 544 (N.Y. 1975)   Cited 77 times
    In Matter of Great E. Mall v Condon (36 N.Y.2d at 548), the Court of Appeals addressed those petitioners' error in failing to name all of the town's assessors pursuant to the pleading requirements set forth in section 704(2) of the Real Property Tax Law.

  3. Nachman v. Jenelo Corp.

    25 A.D.3d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 14 times

    2005-02224. January 17, 2006. In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), dated January 5, 2005, as granted that branch of the defendants' cross motion which was to dismiss the complaint. Dawnald R. Henderson, Old Chatham, N.Y., for appellant. Zegen Fellenbaum, New York, N.Y. (Neal Fellenbaum of counsel), for respondents. Before:

  4. In re Aerotech World

    236 A.D.2d 609 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)   Cited 21 times

    February 24, 1997. In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), dated January 17, 1996, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. Before: Miller, J.P., Sullivan, Florio and Luciano, JJ. Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which dismissed that branch of the petition which was to stay arbitration of any claims arising out of the 1992

  5. In re McNamara v. Board of Assessors

    272 A.D.2d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)   Cited 14 times

    May 30, 2000 In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review five separate determinations of a Judicial Hearing Officer, all dated February 24, 1997, which denied applications pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 7 to reduce tax assessments on two parcels of property, granted applications to reduce tax assessments on two other parcels of property only to a limited extent, and dismissed an application to reduce tax assessments on another parcel of property, respectively, the Board of Assessors

  6. Troy Props. v. Dimitriadis

    56 A.D.3d 1086 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)   Cited 4 times

    No. 504286. November 26, 2008. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Hummel, J.), entered January 11, 2007 in Rensselaer County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to RPTL article 7, granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition. Dennin Dennin, Lake Placid (Gregory M. Dennin of counsel), for appellant. Daniel G. Vincelette, Deputy Corporation Counsel, Troy, for respondents. Before: Peters, J.P., Rose, Lahtinen and Stein, JJ. Kavanagh, J. Petitioner commenced this RPTL article 7 tax proceeding

  7. Town of New Castle v. Kaufmann

    532 N.E.2d 1265 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 23 times
    In Matter of Town of New Castle v Kaufmann (72 NY2d 684, 686), the Court found that "[a] review of the history of RPTL 730 indicates that a narrow construction of the disputed language in this case would deny expedited and inexpensive review to homeowners and thus frustrate the statutory objectives."

  8. Meola v. Assessor of Colonie

    207 A.D.2d 593 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)   Cited 16 times

    August 4, 1994 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Kahn, J.). White, J. Although respondent Town of Colonie Board of Assessment Review reduced petitioners' 1992-1993 assessment on their single-family residence located on Maria Drive in the Town of Colonie, Albany County, from $8,400 to $6,800, petitioners commenced a proceeding under the small claims assessment review procedure (RPTL art 7, tit 1-A) seeking a further reduction to $5,000. At the hearing petitioners, in support of their claim

  9. In re Herbert Regenstreif

    20 Misc. 3d 787 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008)

    No. 1202-08/a. June 18, 2008. Herbert Regenstreif, Mineola, petitioner pro se, and for 358 Willis LLC, petitioner. Lorna B. Goodman, County Attorney, Mineola, for respondents. OPINION OF THE COURT WILLIAM R. LAMARCA, J. The decision and judgment of the court, dated May 27, 2008, is recalled for the purpose of clarifying the conclusion of same and the instant amended decision and judgment is substituted in its place, nunc pro tunc. Requested Relief In a CPLR article 78 proceeding, the petitioners

  10. Town of Tonawanda v. Ayler

    68 N.Y.2d 836 (N.Y. 1986)   Cited 10 times

    Argued September 10, 1986 Decided October 9, 1986 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, Norman J. Wolf, Jr., J. Peter D. Cook, Town Attorney, for appellants. Lewis B. Oliver, Jr., and Harriet B. Oliver for respondents. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (John Q. Driscoll, O. Peter Sherwood and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), in his statutory capacity under Executive Law § 71. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs