§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Mehran Manouel, et al., Appellants,v.Board of Assessors, et al., Respondents.

Brief

3 Cited authorities

  1. Town of New Castle v. Kaufmann

    532 N.E.2d 1265 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 23 times
    In Matter of Town of New Castle v Kaufmann (72 NY2d 684, 686), the Court found that "[a] review of the history of RPTL 730 indicates that a narrow construction of the disputed language in this case would deny expedited and inexpensive review to homeowners and thus frustrate the statutory objectives."

  2. Matter of Masters v. Board of Assessors

    188 A.D.2d 471 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)   Cited 3 times

    December 7, 1992 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McGinity, J.). Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs. The petitioner's property was improved with a single-family owner-occupied residence. Late in 1987, the petitioner moved to a new home. Unable to sell the subject property and unwilling to leave it vacant, he arranged for his father-in-law to live there free of charge until the sale of the property in 1989. During that time, the petitioner applied for a review

  3. Novak & Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

    56 A.D.2d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)   Cited 14 times
    Considering the viability of third-party beneficiary claims under surety bonds