3.3 Rights Suspension and Corruption
Article 100 - Cestui Que Vie Trust
A Cestui Que VieTrust, also known by several other pseudonyms such as “Term ofLifeor Years” or “Pur Autre Vie” or "Fide CommissaryTrust" or “Foreign SitusTrust” or “SecretTrust” is a pseudoformoftrustfirst formed in the 16th Century under Henry VIII of England on one or more presumptions including (but not limited to) one or more Persons presumed wards, infants, idiots, lost or abandoned at “sea” and therefore assumed/presumed “dead” after seven (7) years. Additional presumptions by which such aTrustmay be “legally” formed were added in later statutes to includebankruptcy, incapacity, mortgages and private companies.
Intermsof the evidential history of the formation of Cestui Que Vie Trusts:
(i) The first Cestui Que Vie Trusts formed were through an Act of Henry VIII of England in 1540 (32Hen.8 c1) and later wholly corrupted whereby the poor people of England, after having all their homes, goods and wealth seized in 1535 (27Hen.8 c.28) under the “guise” of small religious estates under £200, were granted the welfare or “commonwealth”benefitof an Cestui Que Use or simply an “estate” with which to live, to work and to bequeath via a written will; and
(ii) In 1666 Westminster and the ruling classes passed the infamous “ProofofLifeAct” also called the Cestui Que Vie Act (19Car.2 c.6) whereby the poor and disenfranchised that had not “proven” to Westminster and the Courts they were alive, were henceforth to be declared “dead in law” and therefore lost, abandoned and theirpropertyto be managed in their absence. This supremely morally repugnant act, which remains in force today, is the birth of Mundi and the infamous occult rituals of the British Courts in the wearing of black robes and other paraphernalia in honoring the “dead”; and
(iii) In 1707 Westminster under Queen Anne (6Ann c.18) extended the provisions of “ProofofLife” and Cestui Que Vie, extending the use of such structures ultimately forcorporateand other franchise purposes. This wicked, profane and completely sacrilegious act in direct defiance to all forms of Christian morals andRule of Lawhas remained a cornerstone of global banking and financial control to the 21st Century; and
(iv) In 1796, King George III (36 Geo.3. c.52 §20) duty was applied to Estates Pur Autre Vie for the first time; and
(v) In 1837 (1 Vict. c.26) and the amendments to the nature of Wills, that if apersonunder anEstatePur Autre Vie (Cestui Que Vie) did not make a proper will, then suchpropertywould be granted to the executors and administrators.
Intermsof the evidential history of the operation and anyformofrelieforremedyassociated with Cestui Que Vie Trusts, taking into account all Statutes referencing Cestui Que Vie prior to 1540 are a deliberate fraud andproofof the illegitimacy of Westminster Statutes:
(i) The “first” Act outlining Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts is deliberately hidden under the claimed statutes of the reign of King Richard III in 1483 (1Rich.3 c.1) whereby the act (still in force) states that all conveyances and transfers and use ofpropertyisgood, even though apurchasermay be unaware it is effectively under “cestui que use” (subject to a Cestui Que VieTrust). The act also gives a vague and challenge path ofreliefthat if one is of completemind, not an infant and not under financial duress then anypropertyunder Cestui Que Vie Trusts is rightfully theirs for use; and
(ii) The “second” Act outlining Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts is deliberately hidden under the reign of Henry 7th in 1488 (4Hen.7 c.17) permitted lords to render any attempt by people classed as “wards” to demonstrate their freedom useless and that such lords may use writs and other devices to “force” such people back to being compliant “wards” (poor slaves). The onlyremedyunder this act was if awarddemonstrated the waste of the lord as to theproperty(and energy) seized from the poor (ignorant white slaves); and
(iii) The “third” Act outlining the operation of Cestui Que Vie only hidden this time asEstatePur Autre Vie was in 1741 under14Geo.2 c.20) whereby one who was knowledgeable of the Cestui Que Vie slavery system could between the ages of 18 to 20, seek to recover suchpropertyunder Cestui Que Vie and cease to be a slave. However, the same act made law that after 20 years, theremedyfor such recovery was no longer available, despite thefactthat the existence of Cestui Que Vie Trusts is denied and Westminster and Banks are sworn to lie, obstruct, hide at all cost the existence of the foundations of global banking slavery.
Intermsof essential elements concerning Cestui Que Vie Trusts:
(ii) ABeneficiaryunderEstatemay be either aBeneficiaryor a Cestui Que (Vie)Trust. When aBeneficiaryloses directbenefitof anyPropertyof the higherEstateplaced in Cestui Que (Vie)Truston their behalf, they do not “own” the Cestui Que (Vie)Trustand are only thebeneficiaryof what the Trustees of the Cestui Que (Vie)Trustchoose to provide them; and
(iii) The original purpose and function of a Cestui Que (Vie)Trustwas toforma temporaryEstatefor thebenefitof another because some event,stateofaffairsor condition prevented them from claiming their status as living, competent and present before a competent authority. Therefore, any claims, history, statutes or arguments that deviate intermsof the origin and function of a Cestui Que (Vie)Trustas pronounced by these canons is false and automatically null and void.
TheTrustCorpus created by a Cestui Que (Vie) is also known as theEstatefrom two Latin words e+statuo literallymeaning“by virtue ofdecree, statute or judgment”. However, as theEstateis held in a Temporary not permanentTrust, the (Corporate)PersonasBeneficiaryis entitled only to equitable title and the use of theProperty, rather than legal title and thereforeownershipof theProperty. Only theCorporation, also known asBody Corporate,EstateandTrustCorpus of a Cestui Que (Vie)Trustpossessesvalidlegal personality.