Bail Reform Act - Crime of Violence

Favorable and Noteworthy Decisions in the Supreme Court and Federal Appellate Courts

United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739 (1987)

The United States Supreme Court upheld the pre-trial detention aspects of the Bail Reform Act which permit detention on the basis of dangerousness.

United States v. Bowers, 432 F.3d 518 (3rd Cir. 2005)

Possession of a firearm by a convicted felon is not a crime of violence for purposes of determining whether to grant the defendant pretrial release.

United States v. Johnson, 399 F.3d 1297 (11th Cir. 2005)

A conviction for the offense of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon does not trigger the provision that requires detention pending sentencing. 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2). 18 U.S.C. § 3156(a)(4) (defining crime of violence).

United States v. Twine, 344 F.3d 987 (9th Cir. 2003)

The Bail Reform Act does not permit pretrial detention without bail based solely on a finding of dangerousness. This interpretation would render meaningless 18 U.S.C. § 314(f)(1) and (2). In addition, the court holds that the offense of felon in possession of a firearm is not a crime of violence for purposes of the Bail Reform Act. Thus, the presumptions are not triggered by this offense.