§

ZTE (USA), Inc. v. SPH America, LLC

10932227 (P.T.A.B. Mar. 20, 2015)
ZTE (USA), Inc. v. SPH America, LLC

8 Cited authorities

  1. DeSilva v. DiLeonardi

    181 F.3d 865 (7th Cir. 1999)   Cited 195 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Refusing to consider arguments that were adopted by reference but not actually made in appellate briefs because "adoption by reference amounts to a self-help increase in the length of the appellate brief"

  2. SPH Am., LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC

    Case No. 3:13-CV-2325-CAB-KSC (S.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2017)   Cited 3 times

    Case No. 3:13-CV-2318-CAB-KSC Case No. 3:13-CV-2319-CAB-KSC Case No. 3:13-CV-2323-CAB-KSC Case No. 3:13-CV-2324-CAB-KSC Case No. 3:13-CV-2325-CAB-KSC 07-14-2017 SPH AMERICA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC, Defendant. SPH AMERICA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. SPRINT CORPORATION Defendant. SPH AMERICA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES, CO., LTD. et al., Defendants, SPH AMERICA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. T-MOBILE US, INC. et al., Defendant. SPH AMERICA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CELLCO PARTNERSHIP d/b/a VERIZON

  3. Application of Bush

    296 F.2d 491 (C.C.P.A. 1961)   Cited 11 times

    Patent Appeal No. 6713. November 17, 1961. Marcus Lothrop, San Francisco, Cal., Harry W.F. Glemser and Bacon Thomas, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D.C. (R.E. Martin, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for Com'r of Patents. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, and SMITH, Judges, and Judge WILLIAM H. KIRKPATRICK. United States Senior District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, designated to participate in place of Judge O'CONNELL, pursuant to provisions

  4. Section 311 - Inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 311   Cited 410 times   205 Legal Analyses
    Establishing grounds and scope of IPR proceeding

  5. Section 314 - Institution of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 314   Cited 380 times   635 Legal Analyses
    Directing our attention to the Director's decision whether to institute inter partes review "under this chapter" rather than "under this section"

  6. Section 42.108 - Institution of inter partes review

    37 C.F.R. § 42.108   Cited 46 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Permitting partial institution

  7. Section 42.22 - Content of petitions and motions

    37 C.F.R. § 42.22   Cited 14 times   16 Legal Analyses

    (a) Each petition or motion must be filed as a separate paper and must include: (1) A statement of the precise relief requested; and (2) A full statement of the reasons for the relief requested, including a detailed explanation of the significance of the evidence including material facts, and the governing law, rules, and precedent. (b)Relief requested. Where a rule in part 1 of this title ordinarily governs the relief sought, the petition or motion must make any showings required under that rule

  8. Section 42.6 - Filing of documents, including exhibits; service

    37 C.F.R. § 42.6   Cited 9 times   44 Legal Analyses

    (a)General format requirements. (1) Page size must be 81/2 inch * 11 inch except in the case of exhibits that require a larger size in order to preserve details of the original. (2) In documents, including affidavits, created for the proceeding: (i) Markings must be in black or must otherwise provide an equivalent dark, high-contrast image; (ii) 14-point, Times New Roman proportional font, with normal spacing, must be used; (iii) Double spacing must be used except in claim charts, headings, tables