ยง

Zolan Sales of Kansas, Inc.

178 N.L.R.B. 238 (N.L.R.B. 1969)
Zolan Sales of Kansas, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 512 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"

  3. Halliday v. U.S.

    315 U.S. 94 (1942)   Cited 27 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 101. Argued January 5, 1942. Decided January 19, 1942. 1. Evidence held sufficient to go to the jury on the question whether petitioner, holder of a War Risk Insurance policy expiring October 31, 1920, was totally and permanently disabled on or before that day, and thereafter. P. 96. 2. In proving that the insured became totally and permanently disabled before the expiration of his War Risk contract, evidence of his conduct and

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Sinclair Company

    397 F.2d 157 (1st Cir. 1968)   Cited 28 times
    In NLRB v. Sinclair Co., 397 F.2d 157, 161 (1st Cir. 1968), one of the three consolidated cases disposed of in the Gissel opinion, the Court of Appeals said, "Whether an employer has used language that is coercive in its effect is a question essentially for the specialized experience of the Board."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Harry F. Berggren Sons, Inc.

    406 F.2d 239 (8th Cir. 1969)   Cited 15 times
    Enforcing the Board's finding that an employer violated Section 8 by conducting a formal "poll" which took place in a non-coercive atmosphere, but which met only four of the five components of the Struksnes standard

  6. Columbian Carbon v. Int'l U

    360 F.2d 1018 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 3 times

    No. 22717. May 17, 1966. James C. Sanders, Culton, Morgan, Britain White, Amarillo, Tex., for appellant. Sam Houston Clinton, Jr., Austin, Tex., for appellee. Before GEWIN and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and WEST, District Judge. THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge: Appellee-Union brought this suit under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. ยง 185, on behalf of certain Company employees to compel arbitration of the question of wages paid temporary construction workers. The district court

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed & Prince Mfg. Co.

    130 F.2d 765 (1st Cir. 1942)   Cited 10 times

    No. 3549. September 16, 1942. Petition for an Order to Show Cause and an Order to Adjust in Contempt. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to have the Reed Prince Manufacturing Company and certain of its officers adjudged in contempt of court. Order in accordance with opinion. Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, and Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen. Counsel, both of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jay Clark, Jr., and George H. Mason, both of Worcester, Mass., for respondent. Before MAGRUDER