§

Zoe Chemical Co., Inc.

160 N.L.R.B. 1001 (N.L.R.B. 1966)
Zoe Chemical Co., Inc.

29 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,675 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.

    363 U.S. 574 (1960)   Cited 5,612 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”

  3. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  4. Labor Board v. Truck Drivers Union

    353 U.S. 87 (1957)   Cited 197 times
    Discussing congressional debate over the Taft-Hartley amendments of 1947

  5. In re Green

    369 U.S. 689 (1962)   Cited 81 times
    Relying on due process cases

  6. Virginian Ry. Co. v. Armentrout

    166 F.2d 400 (4th Cir. 1948)   Cited 133 times
    In Virginian Ry. Co. v. Armentrout, 166 F.2d 400, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, reversed the judgment and ordered a new trial in a personal injury case because of its determination that the verdict was excessive notwithstanding the trial judge had denied a motion for new trial made upon this ground.

  7. Ramsey v. N.L.R.B

    327 F.2d 784 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 44 times
    In Ramsey v. NLRB, 327 F.2d 784 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 377 U.S. 1003, 84 S.Ct. 1938, 12 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1964), the Seventh Circuit declared that "[t]here is no statutory or constitutional right to be present at an arbitration hearing," rejecting the employee's contention that his rights were denied since he was not given notice of the arbitration hearing and did not appear there. The court specifically noted that the facts showed "that the company fully and adequately defended [the employee's] rights at the hearing."

  8. Union Starch Ref. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    186 F.2d 1008 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 51 times
    In Union Starch, the employees had tendered dues and an initiation fee but were denied membership in the union for refusal to file union application forms, attend a union meeting or take the union oath.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tennessee Packers, Inc.

    339 F.2d 203 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 24 times

    No. 15751. December 18, 1964. Theodore J. Martineau, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George V. Gardner, Washington, D.C., Frederick F. Holroyd, Charleston, W. Va., Gardner, Gandal Holroyd, Washington, D.C., on brief, for respondent. Before MILLER and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges, and McALLISTER, Senior Circuit

  10. Sinclair Refining Company v. N.L.R.B

    306 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 22 times
    In Sinclair Refining Company v. N.L.R.B. (5 Cir. 1962) 306 F.2d 569, 577 enforcement of a similar Board order, directing production of data relevant to certain grievances, was refused on the ground that there must first be arbitration to pass on the employer's contention that the contract barred the filing of grievances of the nature in question.