Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§
Zimmerman Plumbing Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent

  3. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Windemuller Elec., Inc.

    34 F.3d 384 (6th Cir. 1994)   Cited 5 times

    No. 92-6240. Argued August 3, 1993. Decided September 14, 1994. Aileen A. Armstrong, Dep. Asso. Gen. Counsel, Peter Winkler (briefed), Margaret E. Luke (argued and briefed), N.L.R.B., Office of Gen. Counsel, Washington, DC, Stephen M. Glasser, Acting Regional Dir., N.L.R.B., Detroit, MI, for N.L.R.B. Peter J. Kok (argued and briefed), Elizabeth M. McIntyre (briefed), Miller, Johnson, Snell Cumminskey, Grand Rapids, MI, for Windemuller Elec., Inc. Construction Employment Services, Inc., pro se. Before:

  5. Procter Gamble Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    658 F.2d 968 (4th Cir. 1981)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that the options available to the employer under the NLRB's remedial order — including "leeway . . . to meet evenings or weekends rather than to grant any uncompensated leave" — "demonstrate that the Board's order does not impose a new contractual provision upon the parties," but rather "serves only to remedy the unfair labor practices found in this case"

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Texas Indep. Oil

    232 F.2d 447 (9th Cir. 1956)   Cited 16 times

    No. 14680. April 18, 1956. Rehearing Denied June 20, 1956. Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Edmond Wilson, Samuel M. Singer, James A. Ryan, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Langmade Sullivan, Phoenix, Ariz., for respondent. Before STEPHENS, FEE, and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges. STEPHENS, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order of

  7. Section 12101 - Findings and purpose

    42 U.S.C. § 12101   Cited 24,534 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Finding a pattern of " unnecessary discrimination and prejudice" that "costs the United States billions of dollars in unnecessary expenses resulting from dependency and nonproductivity"

  8. Section 12112 - Discrimination

    42 U.S.C. § 12112   Cited 14,139 times   159 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing failure to accommodate as form of discrimination

  9. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,903 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions