§

Yulanda L. Curtis,1 Complainant, v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

2019004227 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 8, 2019)
Yulanda L. Curtis,1 Complainant, v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Tex. Dept. of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine

    450 U.S. 248 (1981)   Cited 20,322 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding in the Title VII context that the plaintiff's prima facie case creates "a legally mandatory, rebuttable presumption" that shifts the burden of proof to the employer, and "if the employer is silent in the face of the presumption, the court must enter judgment for the plaintiff"

  2. U.S.E.E.O.C. v. Target Corp.

    460 F.3d 946 (7th Cir. 2006)   Cited 72 times
    Holding that allegations about an employer's lack of credibility, like Jenkins's vague assertion, "will not control"

  3. Section 1614.108 - Investigation of complaints

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.108   Cited 183 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Describing inquisitorial nature of investigation process

  4. Section 1614.405 - Decisions on appeals

    29 C.F.R. § 1614.405   Cited 83 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Providing that " decision [of the EEOC in an administrative appeal] is final . . . unless . . . [e]ither party files a timely request for reconsideration"