§

YRC Inc., d/b/a YRC Freight

360 N.L.R.B. 744 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
YRC Inc., d/b/a YRC Freight

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Garment Workers v. Quality Mfg. Co.

    420 U.S. 276 (1975)   Cited 68 times
    Holding that because the employer “failed to file a petition for reconsideration as permitted by Board Rules and Regulations,” the employer could not assert its objection on appeal

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Igramo Enterprise, Inc.

    310 F. App'x 452 (2d Cir. 2009)

    Nos. 08-1861-ag (L), 08-2207-ag. February 18, 2009. Petition for review of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board. UPON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED. John Diviney (Alan B. Pearl and Siam Asad Ali, on the brief), Alan B. Pearl Associates, Syosset, NY, for Petitioner. Meredith L. Jason, Supervisory Attorney (Jeffrey L. Horowitz, Attorney, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, John H. Ferguson

  5. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Local Lodge 845 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    265 F. App'x 547 (9th Cir. 2008)

    Nos. 05-77400, 05-77408, 05-77419. Argued and Submitted November 9, 2007. Filed January 24, 2008. David A. Rosenfeld, Esq., Weinberg Roger Rosenfeld, Alameda, CA, for Petitioner. Regional Director, National Labor Relations Board Region, Oakland, CA, Regional Director, San Francisco, CA, Aileen A. Armstrong, Esq., Kathleen Lyon, National Labor Relations Board, Contempt Litigation Compliance Branch, Washington, DC, for Respondent. Joel W. Rice, Esq., Fisher Phillips, LLP, Chicago, IL, for Intervenor

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hicks Oils & Hicksgas, Inc.

    942 F.2d 1140 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 3 times

    No. 89-2795. Argued January 14, 1991. Decided September 4, 1991. Barbara A. Atkin, Judith P. Flower, N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, William A. Baudler (argued), N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., Joseph H. Solien, N.L.R.B., Region 14, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner. Gary A. Wincek (argued), William L. Becker, Laner, Muchin, Dombrow, Becker, Levin Tominberg, Chicago, Ill., Nancy M. Watkins, Wilburn, Suggs Watkins, St. Louis, Mo., for respondent