§

Yonkers Hamilton Sanitarium, Inc.

214 N.L.R.B. 668 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Yonkers Hamilton Sanitarium, Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 497 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  2. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  3. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Van Lines

    409 U.S. 48 (1972)   Cited 71 times
    Holding that a statement that striking employees "are being permanently replaced" constituted an unlawful discharge when permanent replacements had not been hired

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Swift and Company

    292 F.2d 561 (1st Cir. 1961)   Cited 52 times

    No. 5752. July 21, 1961. Peter M. Giesey, Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner. William F. Joy, Boston, Mass., with whom Carl G. Bergstedt, Catherine A. Griffin and H. Richard George, Boston, Mass., were on the brief, for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Longshoremen's Ware. Union

    283 F.2d 558 (9th Cir. 1960)   Cited 41 times
    Holding labor union culpable under Taft-Hartley Act for acts performed by its agents, i.e., by union stewards

  7. United Aircraft Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    440 F.2d 85 (2d Cir. 1971)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that because the prevailing party could have sought review of an adverse determination through cross-appeal, "the general rule that `determinations adverse to the winning litigant do not have conclusive effect as collateral estoppel' should not be applied."

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Heck's Inc.

    386 F.2d 317 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 23 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Heck's, Inc., 386 F.2d 317, 322 (4th Cir. 1967), the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals explained the rationale behind not allowing "supervisors" to solicit signatures on union authorization cards.

  9. Local 636, Plumbing Pipe v. N.L.R.B

    287 F.2d 354 (D.C. Cir. 1961)   Cited 27 times

    Nos. 15665, 15707. Argued December 1, 1960. Decided January 19, 1961. Petition for Rehearing Denied March 22, 1961. Mr. Patrick C. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Martin F. O'Donoghue and Thomas X. Dunn, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 15,665. Mr. Morton Namrow, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board,

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Plumbers Un. of Nassau Cty

    299 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 22 times
    Enforcing the order of 131 N.L.R.B. 1243