§

Yellow Enterprise Systems

342 N.L.R.B. 804 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
Yellow Enterprise Systems

17 Cited authorities

  1. Pa. State Police v. Suders

    542 U.S. 129 (2004)   Cited 1,910 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a hostile-work-environment claim is a "lesser included component" of the "graver claim of hostile-environment constructive discharge"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. W.F. Bolin Co. v. N.L.R.B

    70 F.3d 863 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that an "inference of improper employer motivation" is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Grand Canyon Mining Co.

    116 F.3d 1039 (4th Cir. 1997)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 96-1990, 96-2089. Argued May 7, 1997. Decided June 27, 1997. On Application for Enforcement and Cross-Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (11-CA-15801, 11-CA-16059). ARGUED: Jeffrey Lawrence Horowitz, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Matthew Woodruff Sawchak, SMITH, HELMS, MULLISS MOORE, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Respondent. ON BRIEF: Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, Aileen

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Joy Recovery Tech

    134 F.3d 1307 (7th Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times
    Concluding that "[i]n this case, timing is everything," where "[t]he closing of the department comes on the heels of the union's organizational activity," including filing a petition for a representation election

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Main Street Terrace Care Center

    218 F.3d 531 (6th Cir. 2000)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 99-5526, 99-5628. Argued: May 5, 2000. Decided and Filed: July 6, 2000. Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 On Application for Enforcement and Cross-Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. No. 9-CA-35620. ARGUED: J. Randall Richards, Columbus, Ohio, for Respondent. Andrew J. Krafts, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, APPELLATE COURT BRANCH, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. ON BRIEF: J. Randall Richards, Geoffrey E. Webster, Columbus, Ohio, for Respondent. Andrew J

  9. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  10. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"