§

Xu et al. V. Gordon et al. V. Xu et al. V. Xu et al. V. Xu et al.

11626363 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 31, 2012)
Xu et al. V. Gordon et al. V. Xu et al. V. Xu et al. V. Xu et al.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Section 135 - Derivation proceedings

    35 U.S.C. § 135   Cited 286 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Governing interferences

  2. Section 41.127 - Judgment

    37 C.F.R. § 41.127   Cited 9 times   15 Legal Analyses

    (a)Effect within Office - (1)Estoppel. A judgment disposes of all issues that were, or by motion could have properly been, raised and decided. A losing party who could have properly moved for relief on an issue, but did not so move, may not take action in the Office after the judgment that is inconsistent with that party's failure to move, except that a losing party shall not be estopped with respect to any contested subject matter for which that party was awarded a favorable judgment. (2)Final disposal

  3. Section 41.205 - Settlement agreements

    37 C.F.R. § 41.205

    (a)Constructive notice; time for filing. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 135(c) , an agreement or understanding, including collateral agreements referred to therein, made in connection with or in contemplation of the termination of an interference must be filed prior to the termination of the interference between the parties to the agreement. After a final decision is entered by the Board, an interference is considered terminated when no appeal ( 35 U.S.C. 141 ) or other review ( 35 U.S.C. 146 ) has been or