Writers Guild of America, West, Inc.
5 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Mackay Co.
304 U.S. 333 (1938) Cited 535 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
394 U.S. 423 (1969) Cited 117 times 6 Legal AnalysesUpholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"
Florida Power Light v. Electrical Workers
417 U.S. 790 (1974) Cited 96 timesIn Florida Power Light Co. v. IBEW, Local 641, 417 U.S. 790, 804-05, 94 S.Ct. 2737, 2744-45, 41 L.Ed.2d 477 (1974), the Supreme Court held that no § 8(b)(1)(B) violation occurs unless the disciplined conduct adversely affects the performance of his or her § 8(b)(1)(B) duties.
NLRB v. San Francisco Typographical U. No. 21
486 F.2d 1347 (9th Cir. 1973) Cited 4 timesIn San Francisco, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the union violated § 8(b)(1)(B) when it disciplined a foreman who discharged an employee prior to a strike and reversed the Board's finding that disciplining three strikebreakers who were also supervisors was an unfair labor practice.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft, Agricultural Implement Workers
297 F.2d 272 (1st Cir. 1961) Cited 8 timesNo. 5828. Heard October 2, 1961. Decided December 27, 1961. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Harold B. Roitman, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The petitioner, the National