§

Wray Electric Contracting, Inc.

210 N.L.R.B. 757 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Wray Electric Contracting, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 514 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward

    242 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1957)   Cited 23 times

    No. 211, Docket 24251. Argued January 11, 1957. Decided March 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholtz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Florian J. Bartosic, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles J. Barnhill and David L. Dickson, Chicago, Ill., and T.W. Madden, New York, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Lenkurt Electric Co.

    459 F.2d 635 (9th Cir. 1972)

    No. 26786. April 28, 1972. Paul J. Spielberg (argued), Joseph C. Thackery, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Dir., Region 20, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. William F. Hoefs (argued), Ted W. Harris, of Thelen, Marrin, Johnson Bridges, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before MERRILL and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON, District Judge. Honorable Harry Pregerson, United

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pine Products Corp.

    361 F.2d 480 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 1 times

    No. 20539. May 12, 1966. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asso. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Herbert Bernhardt, Glen Bendexsen, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James F. Bodie, Bodie Minturn, Prineville, Or., for respondent. Before MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and BEEKS, District Judge. PER CURIAM: The National Labor Relations Board has found that respondent violated section 8(a)(3) and (1) of the National 61

  5. N.L.R.B. v. McCormick Longmeadow Stone Co.

    374 F.2d 81 (1st Cir. 1967)

    No. 6809. Heard March 7, 1967. Decided March 15, 1967. Warren M. Davison, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Abigail C. Baskir, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Arthur M. Marshall, Springfield, Mass., with whom David I. Shactman, Swampscott, Mass., was on brief, for respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, McENTEE and COFFIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys