Woody Pontiac Sales, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Alva Allen Industries, Inc.

    369 F.2d 310 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 22 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Alva Allen Industries, Inc., 369 F.2d 310, 318 (8th Cir. 1966), the court found no bad faith bargaining where the parties had reached agreement on about 80% of the issues, were apart on wages and union security when the employees struck, and negotiations continued but the employer remained adamant on union security, because "it is only natural that the Company, sensing its strong position, will bargain with increasing toughness and will be less inclined to make concession to the Union."
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

    382 F.2d 921 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 9 times

    No. 23577. September 26, 1967. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., William Wachter, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. David A. Bartholf, Hamilton Bowden, Jacksonville, Fla., for respondents. Before WASHINGTON, TUTTLE and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges. Of the District of Columbia Circuit, sitting by designation. SIMPSON, Circuit Judge. This case is before the Court on

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reliance Clay Prod

    245 F.2d 599 (5th Cir. 1957)   Cited 4 times

    No. 16449. June 10, 1957. Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James R. Rodgers, Turner, Rodgers, Winn, Scurlock Terry, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before BORAH, RIVES and BROWN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In this petition for enforcement of the Board's order, 115 N.L.R.B. 1736, finding the Employer in violation of Section