Woodlawn Hospital

13 Cited authorities

Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight
424 U.S. 554 (1976) Cited 1,144 times
Holding that employees can challenge final decision of arbitrator only if they "prove . . . the Union's breach of duty tainting the decision of the [arbitrator]"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.
389 U.S. 375 (1967) Cited 233 times
In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.
Labor Board v. Fansteel Corp.
306 U.S. 240 (1939) Cited 281 times
In Fansteel, the Board awarded reinstatement with backpay to employees who engaged in a "sit down strike" that led to confrontation with local law enforcement officials.
Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B
414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969) Cited 81 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list
Newspaper Production Company v. N.L.R.B
503 F.2d 821 (5th Cir. 1974) Cited 16 times
Allowing employees to bargain to impasse on restriction of bargaining unit where issue was whether there should be one union or two
Filler Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
376 F.2d 369 (4th Cir. 1967) Cited 22 times
In Filler Products Inc. v. NLRB, 376 F.2d 369, 378 n. 3 (4th Cir. 1967), the court reiterated that "[o]ne of the established ways to determine in disputed cases when an employee is discharged is to ascertain when he was replaced."
Eitel v. Schmidlapp
459 F.2d 609 (4th Cir. 1972) Cited 16 times
No. 71-1926. Argued March 7, 1972. Decided May 2, 1972. Jerome K. Walsh, Jr., New York City (Walsh Frisch, New York City, and Kuykendall, Hall Whiting, Leesburg, Va., on the brief), for appellant. Jack B. Stevens, Alexandria, Va. (Howard, Stevens, Lynch, Cake Howard, Alexandria, Va., and John Howley and Hall, Dickler Howley, Garden City, N. Y., on the brief), for appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER
Intnl. U., Ele., R. M. Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B
307 F.2d 679 (D.C. Cir. 1962) Cited 24 times
Nos. 16273 and 16301. Argued January 4, 1962. Decided June 7, 1962. Petition for Rehearing Denied in No. 16,273 July 5, 1962. Certiorari Denied December 10, 1962. See 83 S.Ct. 307. Mr. David S. Davidson, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Benjamin C. Sigal, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 16273. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General
Methodist Hospital of Ky., Inc. v. N.L.R.B
619 F.2d 563 (6th Cir. 1980) Cited 5 times
No. 77-1057. Argued February 7, 1979. Decided March 20, 1980. James U. Smith, Jr., Louis E. Woolery, Smith Smith, Louisville, Ky., Henry D. Stratton, Stratton, May Hays, Pikeville, Ky., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Marion Griffin, Candace M. Carroll, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Joan H. Rosenzweig, Edward C. Verst, Region 9, N.L.R.B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before EDWARDS, Chief Circuit Judge,
Woodlawn Hospital v. N.L.R.B
596 F.2d 1330 (7th Cir. 1979) Cited 4 times
Recognizing that where the Board properly finds a violation of the Act, it can order reinstatement under its remedial powers granted by § 160(c), although finding no violation of the Act here
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Woodlawn Hospital

13 Cited authorities

Holding that employees can challenge final decision of arbitrator only if they "prove . . . the Union's breach of duty tainting the decision of the [arbitrator]"

In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

In Fansteel, the Board awarded reinstatement with backpay to employees who engaged in a "sit down strike" that led to confrontation with local law enforcement officials.

Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

Allowing employees to bargain to impasse on restriction of bargaining unit where issue was whether there should be one union or two

In Filler Products Inc. v. NLRB, 376 F.2d 369, 378 n. 3 (4th Cir. 1967), the court reiterated that "[o]ne of the established ways to determine in disputed cases when an employee is discharged is to ascertain when he was replaced."

Recognizing that where the Board properly finds a violation of the Act, it can order reinstatement under its remedial powers granted by § 160(c), although finding no violation of the Act here

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"