ยง

Wood, Wire and Metal Lathers International Union

97 N.L.R.B. 574 (N.L.R.B. 1951)
Wood, Wire and Metal Lathers International Union

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

  3. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  4. Carpenters Union v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 707 (1951)   Cited 89 times
    In Carpenters Union v. Labor Board, 341 U.S. 707, 71 S.Ct. 966, 971, supra, the Supreme Court said: "The use of such pressure on this renovation project was merely a sample of what might be repeated elsewhere if not prohibited. The underlying dispute between petitioners and Watson's has not been shown to have been resolved."

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Serv. Trade C

    191 F.2d 65 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 44 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Service Trade Chauffeurs, etc., supra, it was said: "We take this to mean that a union may lawfully inflict harm on a neutral employer, without violating ยง 8 (b) (4), so long as the harm is merely incidental to a traditionally lawful primary strike, conducted at the place where the primary employer does business."

  6. National Labor Relations Bd. v. United BHD

    184 F.2d 60 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times

    No. 3969. August 14, 1950. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C. (Robert N. Denham, David P. Findling, and A. Norman Somers, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Clif. Langsdale, Kansas City, Mo. (John J. Manning, Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for respondents. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges. BRATTON, Circuit Judge. In presently pertinent part, section 8(b)(4)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, as amended by the Labor-Management

  7. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Walt Disney Prod

    146 F.2d 44 (9th Cir. 1945)   Cited 27 times

    No. 10603. December 5, 1944. Rehearing Denied January 11, 1945. Upon Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of its order against Walt Disney Productions. Order modified and enforced. Alvin J. Rockwell, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Malcolm F. Halliday, Associate Gen. Counsel, and David Finding and Charles Ryan, Attys., N.L.R.B., all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gunther R. Lessing, O'Melveney Myers

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Denver Bldg

    192 F.2d 577 (10th Cir. 1952)   Cited 7 times

    No. 4260. October 18, 1951. Rehearing Denied January 5, 1952. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Finding, A. Norman Somers, Washington, D.C., and Margaret M. Farmer, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Philip Hornbein, Jr., Denver, Colo. (Philip Hornbein, Denver, Colo., on the brief), for respondents. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This is a conventional proceeding under Section 10(e) of the National