§

Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation

365 NLRB No. 55 (N.L.R.B. 2017)
Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation

8 Cited authorities

  1. Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt

    136 S. Ct. 2292 (2016)   Cited 341 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because "there was no significant health-related problem that the new law helped cure," the law did not "advance Texas’ legitimate interest in protecting women's health"

  2. Commissioner v. Sunnen

    333 U.S. 591 (1948)   Cited 1,750 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when a court has entered a final judgment dismissing a claim, the parties to the suit are precluded from relitigating it

  3. Lawlor v. Nat'l Screen Serv.

    349 U.S. 322 (1955)   Cited 889 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that two suits were not "based on the same cause of action," because "[t]he conduct presently complained of was all subsequent to" the prior judgment and it "cannot be given the effect of extinguishing claims which did not even then exist and which could not possibly have been sued upon in the previous case"

  4. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees

    327 F.3d 1309 (11th Cir. 2003)   Cited 130 times
    Holding that "federal preclusion principles apply to prior federal decisions, whether previously decided in diversity or federal question jurisdiction"

  5. Miller's Ale House, Inc. v. Boynton Carolina Ale House, LLC

    702 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2012)   Cited 92 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding no actual deception where plaintiff did not adduce any reliable consumer or market research showing deception and instead produced only anecdotal evidence

  6. Evankavitch v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC

    793 F.3d 355 (3d Cir. 2015)   Cited 35 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden to prove an exception to liability under another statute lies with the defendant and relying on interpretations of the TCPA holding that consent is an exception to liability for which the defendant bears the burden of proof

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Donna-Lee Sportswear Co., Inc.

    836 F.2d 31 (1st Cir. 1987)   Cited 39 times
    Holding that district court's prior determination, that no binding labor agreement between the parties had been formed, resulted in issue preclusion against the NLRB decision at a later date that a contract had been formed

  8. National Labor Rel. Board v. Marydale Products

    311 F.2d 890 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 3 times

    No. 19551. January 3, 1963. Rehearing Denied March 13, 1963. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Joseph C. Thackery, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Herman M. Baginsky, Cobb Wright, Lloyd J. Cobb, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges. JOSEPH C. HUTCHESON, Jr., Circuit Judge. This case is before the court on the petition of the National