Wix Corp.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
  2. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 506 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 118 times
    In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Threads, Incorporated

    308 F.2d 1 (4th Cir. 1962)   Cited 37 times
    In NLRB v. Threads, Inc., 308 F.2d 1, 9 (4th Cir. 1962), in which I concurred, we made the logic-defying statement that prior (or presumably simultaneous) unlawful labor practices can "not transform protected free speech into unlawful and unprotected speech."
  5. Agwilines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    87 F.2d 146 (5th Cir. 1936)   Cited 74 times
    In Agwilines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 87 F.2d 146, 147, and in Waterman S.S. Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 119 F.2d 760, a contempt proceeding involving the ascertainment of back payments necessary to make employees whole, we dealt with the purpose and effect of the "make whole" provisions of the statute.
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Colten

    105 F.2d 179 (6th Cir. 1939)   Cited 62 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Colten, 6 Cir., 105 F.2d 179, 183, it was said that "* * * the strife which is sought to be averted is no less an object of legislative solicitude when contract, death, or operation of law brings about change of ownership in the employing agency."
  7. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. v. N.L.R.B

    191 F.2d 483 (D.C. Cir. 1951)   Cited 30 times

    No. 10863. Argued May 10, 1951. Decided July 5, 1951. John E. Powell, Washington, D.C., with whom Arthur P. Drury and John M. Lynham, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner. Dominick L. Manoli, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., with whom A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for respondent. Before CLARK, PROCTOR and BAZELON, Circuit Judges. BAZELON, Circuit Judge. Samuel Kohen was employed as an

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wix Corp.

    309 F.2d 826 (4th Cir. 1962)   Cited 7 times

    No. 8549. Argued March 21, 1962. Decided November 5, 1962. Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Melvin J. Welles, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, on brief), for petitioner. J.W. Alexander, Jr., Charlotte, N.C. (Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on brief) for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges. HAYNSWORTH

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. Allure Shoe Corp.

    277 F.2d 231 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 5 times

    No. 17968. April 14, 1960. Margaret M. Farmer, Thomas J. McDermott, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Joseph A. Perkins, Marchant Perkins, Miami, Fla., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, TUTTLE and JONES, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge. In its decision and order, approving and adopting, except in two particulars, the findings, conclusions and recommendations

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Parran

    237 F.2d 373 (4th Cir. 1956)   Cited 7 times

    No. 7235. Argued October 5, 1956. Decided October 10, 1956. Arnold Ordman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Nancy M. Sherman, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. S. Harrison Kahn, Washington, D.C. (David Jay Hyman, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, SOBELOFF, Circuit Judge, and BRYAN, District