§
WIPO, Inc.

25 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

  2. Labor Board v. Pittsburgh S.S. Co.

    337 U.S. 656 (1949)   Cited 88 times
    Holding "total rejection of an opposed view cannot of itself impugn the integrity or competence of a trier of fact"

  3. International Union

    459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Varo, Inc.

    425 F.2d 293 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 47 times
    High-ranking officer, in his office and with secretary present and taking notes, questioned employees

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Griggs Equipment, Inc.

    307 F.2d 275 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 52 times
    In Griggs, the issue was not even mentioned in the Board's Decision, but is noted in the decision of the court of appeals.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Central Power Light Company

    425 F.2d 1318 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 30 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Central Pwr. Light Co., 425 F.2d 1318 (5th Cir. 1970), the original charge alleged a discriminatory discharge of an employee and stated the company had violated section 7 rights "by other acts and conduct."

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Challenge-Cook Bros. of Ohio, Inc.

    374 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 34 times
    Finding inference that supervisor who walked past a sign every day saw that sign was reasonable and provided substantial evidence for the NLRB's decision

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Whitfield Pickle Company

    374 F.2d 576 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 29 times

    No. 22949. March 24, 1967. Rehearing Denied April 18, 1967. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frank H. Itkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Fred S. Ball, Montgomery, Ala., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges. GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board here petitions for enforcement of its order directed

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Condenser Corp.

    128 F.2d 67 (3d Cir. 1942)   Cited 62 times

    No. 7683. Argued January 5, 1942. Decided March 25, 1942. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the Board against Condenser Corporation of America and Cornell-Dubilier Electric Corporation, and Electrical Condensers Union, Local B-1041, of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, intervenor. A petition for leave to adduce additional evidence was filed. Petition for an enforcing decree granted with