§
Winkle Bus Co.

20 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Lunney, an Infant v. Prodigy Services Co.

    529 U.S. 1098 (2000)   Cited 73 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 99-1430. May 1, 2000, OCTOBER TERM, 1999. Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 94 N. Y. 2d 242, 723 N. E. 2d 539.

  4. Eljer Manufacturing v. Kowin Development Corp.

    512 U.S. 1205 (1994)   Cited 82 times
    Holding that the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code's duration and citizenship requirements for permits under Texas' comprehensive regulatory scheme for distribution and sale of alcoholic beverages constitute economic protectionism and violate the dormant commerce clause

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Calkins

    187 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 1999)   Cited 53 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that Nevada law does not extend special protection to free speech interests at the expense of a private store owner's property interest

  7. Federated Logistics Operations v. N.L.R.B

    400 F.3d 920 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 16 times

    Nos. 03-1323, 03-1357. Argued September 14, 2004. Decided February 25, 2005. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Meir Feder argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Andrew M. Kramer and Julia M. Broas. Robert J. Englehart, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel

  8. Ryder Truck Rental v. N.L.R.B

    401 F.3d 815 (7th Cir. 2005)   Cited 13 times
    Finding that an employer's explanation that it discharged an employee because the employee falsified maintenance reports was pretextual because the employer had never discharged other employees based on this offense and the employer had instructed employees to falsify maintenance reports

  9. L.S.F. Transp., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    282 F.3d 972 (7th Cir. 2002)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 00-2040, 00-2289. Argued November 29, 2001. Decided March 11, 2002. Petitioned for review of, and National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Walter J. Liszka (argued), Wessels Pautsch, Chicago, IL, for petitioner. Elizabeth Kinney, National Labor Relations Board, Chicago, IL, Bridget O'Connor (argued), National Labor Relations Board Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., Aileen Armstrong, National Labor Relations Board Office of the General Counsel, Washington, D.C., for respondent

  10. Torbitt Castleman v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    123 F.3d 899 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 17 times
    Stating that an employee's subjective reaction does not render the challenged conduct unlawful

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,317 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355