§

Windsor Industries, Inc.

273 N.L.R.B. 1157 (N.L.R.B. 1984)
Windsor Industries, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,038 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. General Stencils, Inc.

    438 F.2d 894 (2d Cir. 1971)   Cited 38 times
    In General Stencils we compared and contrasted cases involving coercive interrogation, threats to close plants, discriminatory discharges, loss of benefits and the like, id. at 903, with the facts in General Stencils, which principally involved unlawful interrogation of one employee about his statement to a Board agent, coupled with threats to a few employees to withdraw benefits of a relatively minor nature.

  3. J.J. Newberry Co. v. N.L.R.B

    645 F.2d 148 (2d Cir. 1981)   Cited 23 times
    In J.J. Newberry, 645 F.2d 148, the court found an 8(a)(1) violation where the employer announced a wage increase prior to an election.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Marion Rohr Corp.

    714 F.2d 228 (2d Cir. 1983)   Cited 19 times
    Rejecting bargaining order in face of 35% turnover

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Knogo Corp.

    727 F.2d 55 (2d Cir. 1984)   Cited 12 times
    In Knogo we said that among the mitigating factors the NLRB is obliged to consider before issuing a bargaining order are the passage of time and the rate of employee turnover and we held that "[a]lthough `we must guard against rewarding an employer for his own misconduct or delaying tactics,'" At 60, quoting Jamaica Towing, 632 F.2d at 214, where the company was not responsible for twenty-two months of the lapse of time and there was a large employee turnover, a bargaining order should not issue.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pace Oldsmobile, Inc.

    681 F.2d 99 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 13 times

    No. 760, Docket 81-4207. Argued April 5, 1982. Decided May 28, 1982. Linda Dreeben, Washington, D.C. (William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Stuart M. Kirshenbaum, New York City (Lawrence I. Milman, Milman, Naness Pollack, New York City, on brief), for respondent. Before KEARSE and PIERCE, Circuit Judges, and LEVAL,