§

Windsor Convalescent Center

21-CA-036422 (N.L.R.B. Jan. 31, 2006)
Windsor Convalescent Center

8 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. FES

    301 F.3d 83 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 49 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding issue not exhausted where the "tenor" of petitioner's objection to the Board was "purely factual," but the tenor of the objection on appeal was legal

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Advanced Stretchforming Intern

    233 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 19 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board is entitled to summary enforcement of unchallenged rulings

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Florida Steel Corp.

    586 F.2d 436 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 19 times

    No. 77-3432. December 15, 1978. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Dave Fleischer, Atty., Michael Winer, Supervisor Atty., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jeffrey L. Gibbs, Washington, D.C., for United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO. Hamilton Bowden, Charles F. Henley, Jr., William H. Andrews, Jacksonville, Fla., for respondent. Harold A. Boire, Director Region 12, N

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Honeywell, Inc.

    722 F.2d 405 (8th Cir. 1983)   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Honeywell the employer maintained two bulletin boards: one contained notices for company-sponsored organizations and activities, and the other contained employees' notices for work-related activities — except for unions.