§

Winchester Electronics, Inc.

128 N.L.R.B. 1292 (N.L.R.B. 1960)
Winchester Electronics, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 512 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"

  2. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  3. United Corp. v. Securities and Exchange Commission

    348 U.S. 820 (1954)   Cited 32 times

    No. 99. October 14, 1954. C.A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Richard Joyce Smith, William S. Potter and William R. Sherwood for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff and William H. Timbers for respondent. Reported below: 211 F. 2d 231.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.

    94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 178 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Missouri Transit

    250 F.2d 261 (8th Cir. 1957)   Cited 15 times

    No. 15796. December 27, 1957. Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Duane B. Beeson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Glenn L. Moller, St. Louis, Mo. (Moller Talent, St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for respondents. Before SANBORN, WOODROUGH and JOHNSEN, Circuit Judges. SANBORN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nesen

    211 F.2d 559 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 13 times

    No. 13204. February 26, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Julius G. Serot, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Potruch, Fredricks Lerten, Erwin Lerten, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and BONE, Circuit Judges. DENMAN, Chief Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (hereafter the Board) petitions for an adjudication that respondent, R.D. Nesen, is in civil contempt