§

Wilson Wholesale Meat Co., Inc.

209 N.L.R.B. 222 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Wilson Wholesale Meat Co., Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  3. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 317 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

  4. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. L.B. Foster Company

    418 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 47 times
    In Foster, the Ninth Circuit answered: "Emphasis is given to the rapid turnover in the employer's personnel as a reason for not enforcing the order.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Kaiser Agr. Chem., Div. of Kaiser

    473 F.2d 374 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 37 times

    No. 72-1379. February 2, 1973. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Walter C. Phillips, Director, Thaddeus R. Sobieski, Region 10, N.L.R.B., Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner. John E. McFall, Andrew C. Partee, Jr., New Orleans, La., for respondent. Petition for enforcement from the National Labor Relations Board. Before RIVES, WISDOM and RONEY, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order that the respondent

  7. Southwest Regional Jt. Bd., v. N.L.R.B

    441 F.2d 1027 (D.C. Cir. 1970)   Cited 17 times
    Finding that the "proper question `is not whether an employee actually felt intimidated but whether the employer engaged in conduct which may reasonably be said to tend to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act'" (quoting Joy Silk Mills, supra, 185 F.2d at 743-44)

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Dixisteel Buildings, Inc.

    445 F.2d 1260 (8th Cir. 1971)   Cited 11 times

    No. 71-1053. July 26, 1971. William R. Stewart, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William F. Wachter, Atty., N.L.R.B. for petitioner. William W. Alexander, Jr., Fisher Phillips, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before LAY, HEANEY and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges. BRIGHT, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board determined that the respondent-employer, Dixisteel Buildings, Inc. (Dixisteel)

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Des Moines Foods, Inc.

    296 F.2d 285 (8th Cir. 1961)   Cited 20 times

    No. 16694. November 29, 1961. Leo N. McGuire, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. made argument for petitioner. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Atty., and Leo N. McGuire, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C. were on the brief. Hobart E. Newton, Stuart, Iowa, made argument for respondent, and was on the brief. Before SANBORN, MATTHES and RIDGE, Circuit Judges. SANBORN

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Tallahassee Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

    409 F.2d 201 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 5 times

    No. 26322. April 2, 1969. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Harold A. Boire, Reg. Dir., N.L.R.B., Tampa, Fla., Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Leonard M. Wagman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Daniel R. Coffman, Jr., Robert C. Lanquist, Hamilton Bowden, Jacksonville, Fla., for respondent. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GEWIN and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges. PER