§

Wilson-Oldsmobile

110 N.L.R.B. 534 (N.L.R.B. 1954)
Wilson-Oldsmobile

7 Cited authorities

  1. Howell Chev. Co. v. Labor Board

    346 U.S. 482 (1953)   Cited 38 times
    Holding that a car retailer is subject to Commerce Clause as an "'integral part' of General Motors' national system of distribution."

  2. National Labor Rel. Board v. Somerville Buick

    194 F.2d 56 (1st Cir. 1952)   Cited 13 times

    No. 4606. January 28, 1952. Dominick L. Manoli, Attorney, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Roland E. Ginsburg, Attorney, all of Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Julius Kirle, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before CLARK, WOODBURY, and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 61

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bill Daniels, Inc.

    202 F.2d 579 (6th Cir. 1953)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 11536, 11582. January 20, 1953. Rehearing Denied March 17, 1953. John E. Jay, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers and Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Frank E. Kenney, Detroit, Mich., for respondents. Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges. ALLEN, Circuit Judge. The question presented in these cases arising out of petitions for enforcement of orders of the National Labor Relations Board is whether

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Conover Motor Co.

    192 F.2d 779 (10th Cir. 1951)   Cited 10 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Conover Motor Co., 10 Cir., 192 F.2d 779, 781, the court said: "The fact that these dealers are only one of many and that the repercussions of a work stoppage in their business would have relatively little impact on the total flow of the manufacturers' interstate activities is not fatal to jurisdiction.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Brooks

    204 F.2d 899 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 5 times

    No. 13502. May 14, 1953. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and William J. Avrutis, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Carter Potruch, Erwin Lerten, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and BONE, Circuit Judges. BONE, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of the Board's order directing

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Ken Rose Motors

    193 F.2d 769 (1st Cir. 1952)   Cited 6 times

    No. 4605. January 21, 1952. Fannie M. Boyls, Attorney, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Abraham Siegel, Attorney, all of Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Edmund J. Blake, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act, as amended

  7. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Davis Motors

    192 F.2d 782 (10th Cir. 1951)   Cited 5 times

    No. 4281. November 5, 1951. Owsley Vose, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers and Nancy M. Sherman, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Emory L. O'Connell, Denver, Colo., for respondent. Before, PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and MURRAH and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. MURRAH, Circuit Judge. This case is here upon a petition of the National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to Section 10(e) of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 136, 29 U.S