§

Wilshire at Lakewood

343 N.L.R.B. 141 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
Wilshire at Lakewood

9 Cited authorities

  1. National Labor Rel. B. v. Kentucky R. Comm. C

    532 U.S. 706 (2001)   Cited 178 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden of proving a statutory exception generally falls on the party who claims a benefit

  2. Beth Israel Hospital v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 483 (1978)   Cited 219 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in the context of solicitation rules, such circumstances are required to justify restrictions on solicitation during nonworking time

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yeshiva University

    444 U.S. 672 (1980)   Cited 182 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that all faculty members are managers for purposes of federal labor law even though they lack any legal instruments of control

  4. Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.

    369 U.S. 404 (1962)   Cited 298 times
    Explaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"

  5. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 205 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Baptist Hospital, Inc.

    442 U.S. 773 (1979)   Cited 71 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding solicitation ban in corridors and sitting rooms

  7. Alois Box Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    216 F.3d 69 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 11 times
    Upholding the Board's finding of supervisory status based in large part on the fact that the worker made "his own assessments of employees' skills or expertise"

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Chicago Metallic Corp.

    794 F.2d 527 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 14 times
    In Chicago Metallic, unlike the situation presented here, the employee at issue was assigned no manual chores and had the authority and discretion to take disciplinary action against employees.

  9. American Cast Iron Pipe Co. v. N.L.R.B

    600 F.2d 132 (8th Cir. 1979)   Cited 4 times

    No. 78-1233. Submitted November 14, 1978. Decided June 4, 1979. Fredric Ingram of Thomas, Taliaferro, Forman, Burr Murray, Birmingham, Ala. (argued), and Robert F. Childs, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., on brief, for petitioner. Candace M. Carroll, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (argued), John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on brief, for respondent. Appeal