§

Williams Energy Services

336 N.L.R.B. 160 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Williams Energy Services

6 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Vincent Industrial Plastics, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    209 F.3d 727 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 44 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Vincent Industrial, we directed the Board to premise every bargaining order on an "explicit[ balanc[ing][of] three considerations: (1) the employees' Section 7 rights [ 29 U.S.C. § 157]; (2) whether other purposes of the [NLRA] override the rights of employees to choose their bargaining representatives; and (3) whether alternative remedies are adequate to remedy the violations of the [NLRA]]."

  3. Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    117 F.3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them

  4. Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    28 F.3d 1243 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 28 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stressing appropriateness of bargaining order to remedy bad faith bargaining during certification year

  5. National Labor Relations v. Maryland Ambulance Servs., Inc.

    192 F.3d 430 (4th Cir. 1999)   Cited 2 times

    No. 98-2592 Argued: May 6, 1999 Decided: September 23, 1999 On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (5-CA-27611) ARGUED: J. Michael McGuire, SHAWE ROSENTHAL, Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioner. Richard A. Cohen, Senior Attorney, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. ON BRIEF: R. Michael Smith, SHAWE ROSENTHAL, Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioner. Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, John

  6. Landmark Intern. Trucks, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    699 F.2d 815 (6th Cir. 1983)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Landmark International, the Sixth Circuit held that the evidence failed to support the Board's finding that Landmark had violated § 8(a)(1) by sending letters to employees advising them of their right to resign from the union and to revoke the dues checkoff authorization.