William H. Krueger, Complainant, v. Alphonso Jackson, Acting Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Agency Appeal No. 01A43624 Agency No. KC-01-01 Hearing No. 280-2004-4035X
01A43624_r (E.E.O.C. Aug. 20, 2004)
William H. Krueger, Complainant, v. Alphonso Jackson, Acting Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Agency Appeal No. 01A43624 Agency No. KC-01-01 Hearing No. 280-2004-4035X
340 U.S. 474 (1951) Cited 9,569 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
456 U.S. 273 (1982) Cited 1,614 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"