WIlliam H. Dixon

5 Cited authorities

  1. Radovich v. Nat. Football League

    352 U.S. 445 (1957)   Cited 255 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that volume of interstate business involved in organized professional football places it within provisions of antitrust laws
  2. Toolson v. New York Yankees

    346 U.S. 356 (1953)   Cited 106 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc., 346 U.S. 356, 357, we refused to re-examine a prior decision holding baseball not to be covered by the antitrust laws, stating that "[t]he business has thus been left for thirty years to develop, on the understanding that it was not subject to existing antitrust legislation."
  3. U.S. v. International Boxing Club

    348 U.S. 236 (1955)   Cited 70 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Refusing to extend "baseball" exemption to boxing
  4. United States v. Shubert

    348 U.S. 222 (1955)   Cited 62 times
    Finding that business built around the performance of local theatrical productions is subject to antitrust laws
  5. Federal Club v. National League

    259 U.S. 200 (1922)   Cited 136 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the business of providing public baseball games for profit between clubs of professional baseball players was not within the scope of federal antitrust laws