§
William F. Wielinski

7 Cited authorities

  1. Indianapolis Colts v. Metro. Baltimore Football

    34 F.3d 410 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 232 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that infringement of Colts trademark was expressly aimed at Indiana where trademark holder and bulk of confused fans were located

  2. Wallpaper Mfrs. v. Crown Wallcovering Corp.

    680 F.2d 755 (C.C.P.A. 1982)   Cited 32 times
    Explaining "even where there is reverse confusion ... another source with superior de jure rights may prevail regardless of what source or sources the public identifies with the mark"

  3. Morehouse Mfg. Corp. v. J. Strickland

    407 F.2d 881 (C.C.P.A. 1969)   Cited 37 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Morehouse Mfg. Corp. v. J. Strickland Co., 407 F.2d 881, 888-89, 160 USPQ 715, 721 (CCPA 1969) the court stated that false suggestion requires the existence of likelihood of confusion.

  4. University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Imports Co.

    703 F.2d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 1983)   Cited 19 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Imports Co., 703 F.2d 1372, 1376, 217 USPQ 505, 509 (Fed. Cir. 1983), the court added that section 2(a) embraces concepts of the right to privacy which may be violated even in the absence of likelihood of confusion.

  5. Sutton Cosmetics

    455 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 32 times

    No. 208, Docket 71-1722. Argued October 28, 1971. Decided January 25, 1972. Morton Amster, New York City, N.Y. (Alfred B. Engelberg and Amster Rothstein, New York City, on the brief), for appellees. Arthur H. Seidel, Philadelphia, Pa. (Allen L. Greenberg, McKeesport, Pa., and Seidel, Gonda Goldhammer, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Before LUMBARD, HAYS and OAKES, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit

  6. In re Omaha Nat. Corp.

    819 F.2d 1117 (Fed. Cir. 1987)   Cited 4 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Appeal No. 86-1567. May 20, 1987. Dennis L. Thomte, Zarley, McKee, Thomte, Voorhees Sease, Omaha, Neb., argued for appellant. Nancy C. Slutter, Asst. Sol., Arlington, Va., argued for appellee. With her on the brief were Joseph F. Nakamura, Sol. and Fred E. McKelvey, Deputy Sol., Washington, D.C. Appeal from the Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before NIES, Circuit Judge, COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and ARCHER, Circuit Judge. NIES, Circuit Judge. Omaha National Bank appeals

  7. Popular Merchandise Co. v. "21" Club, Inc.

    343 F.2d 1011 (C.C.P.A. 1965)   Cited 4 times
    Holding that corporations were included within statutory phrase “persons living or dead”