William B. Tanner Co.

5 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board
321 U.S. 702 (1944) Cited 252 times 1 Legal Analyses
Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
Pepper Tanner, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
474 F.2d 1256 (6th Cir. 1973) Cited 3 times
No. 72-1591. Argued February 1, 1973. Decided March 1, 1973. James E. Irwin, Memphis, Tenn., for petitioner. Michael F. Messite, N.L.R.B., for respondent; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Robert A. Giannasi, Daniel M. Katz, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., John J.A. Reynolds, Jr., Director Region 26, N.L.R.B., Memphis, Tenn., on brief. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before PHILLIPS, Chief
Dickey v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
217 F.2d 652 (6th Cir. 1954) Cited 16 times
No. 12236. December 16, 1954. John M. Jarboe, Akron, Ohio, William B. Moore, Lisbon, Ohio, for petitioners. Samuel M. Singer, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C., on brief, for respondent. Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges. ALLEN, Circuit Judge. This is a petition to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board entered in proceedings instituted by the International Brotherhood of Blacksmiths, Drop Forgers
Union Carbide Carbon v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.
244 F.2d 672 (6th Cir. 1957) Cited 10 times
In Union Carbide and Carbon Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 244 F.2d 672 (6th Cir. 1957), also cited by the company, there is no discussion of whether or not unit employees were allowed to vote on the merger of their union with another at an international level.

William B. Tanner Co.

5 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

Pepper Tanner, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

Dickey v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

Union Carbide Carbon v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

In Union Carbide and Carbon Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 244 F.2d 672 (6th Cir. 1957), also cited by the company, there is no discussion of whether or not unit employees were allowed to vote on the merger of their union with another at an international level.