Wil-Shar, Inc.
9 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,036 times 71 Legal AnalysesHolding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 734 times 7 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Bourne v. N.L.R.B
332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964) Cited 93 times 1 Legal AnalysesIn Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.
ZIM'S FOODLINER, INC. v. N.L.R.B
495 F.2d 1131 (7th Cir. 1974) Cited 44 timesHolding that the owner of a single store purchased from the Kroger chain was a successor employer
St. Luke's Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
268 F.3d 575 (8th Cir. 2001) Cited 8 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding unprotected "materially false and misleading" statement that hospital was " ‘jeopardizing the health of mothers and babies’ by depleting its staff of labor and delivery [nurses], reducing the effectiveness of the remaining [nurses] by increasing their duties, and providing less qualified replacements"
Crown Cork Seal Co. v. N.L.R.B
36 F.3d 1130 (D.C. Cir. 1994) Cited 14 timesHolding that remand was unnecessary because the agency had "suggested no alternative bases for upholding" its determination
J.P. Stevens Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B
638 F.2d 676 (4th Cir. 1980) Cited 15 timesRecognizing significance of employer's history of § 8 violations
N.L.R.B. v. Limestone Apparel Corp.
705 F.2d 799 (6th Cir. 1982) Cited 3 timesNo. 81-1693. October 29, 1982. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jacob Oliner, Oliner Oliner, New York City, for respondent. Petition to Enforce an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before LIVELY, KRUPANSKY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges. ORDER This cause comes before the Court upon the motion of the intervenor, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, for an order enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board in Limestone
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Longview Fur. Co.
206 F.2d 274 (4th Cir. 1953) Cited 20 timesDescribing the disruptive effect of a court order that forces an employer to reinstate an employee who has "use[d] profane and indecent language"