§

Whiting Milk Corp.

145 N.L.R.B. 1035 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Whiting Milk Corp.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 359 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

  2. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 471 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  3. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  4. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

  5. Trailmobile Co. v. Whirls

    331 U.S. 40 (1947)   Cited 111 times
    Noting that the “interpretation of statutes cannot safely be made to rest upon mute intermediate legislative maneuvers”

  6. Reserve Supply Corp. of L.I., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    317 F.2d 785 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 22 times
    In Reserve Supply Corp., we explained that "[w]hen the statutes are silent," as they are here, "the question of whether interest shall be awarded is to be determined in accordance with the historic judicial principle that one for whose financial advantage an obligation was assumed or imposed, and who has suffered actual money damages by another's breach of that obligation, should be fairly compensated for the loss thereby sustained."

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Armstrong Tire, Tire Test

    263 F.2d 680 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 14 times
    In Armstrong Tire, the Fifth Circuit held that an employee's self-employment was not sufficient bona-fide to satisfy his duty to mitigate, and the Fifth Circuit reiterated that a discharged employee must exercise reasonable diligence to seek other employment.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Filtron Company

    309 F.2d 184 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 4 times

    No. 36, Docket 27395. Submitted October 16, 1962. Decided November 1, 1962. Melvin Pollack, atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asso. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Melvin J. Welles, Stuart Broad, attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Ernest H. Falk, Brooklyn, N.Y., for respondent Filtron Company, Inc. John I. Coster, New York City, for respondent Filter Workers

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. Potlatch Forests

    189 F.2d 82 (9th Cir. 1951)   Cited 13 times

    No. 12532. May 11, 1951. Rehearing Denied July 6, 1951. Robert N. Denham, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, Albert M. Dreyer, Maurice Alexandre, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington D.C., for petitioner. R.N. Elder, Robt. H. Elder, Sidney E. Smith, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, George W. Beardmore, Lewiston, Idaho, for respondent. Before ORR and POPE, Circuit Judges, and FEE, District Judge. ORR, Circuit Judge. National Labor Relations