§
Whitesell Corp.

15 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Amax Coal Co.

    453 U.S. 322 (1981)   Cited 364 times
    Holding that a management-appointed trustee to a multiemployer pension plan could not be considered a management representative

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 261 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  3. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 493 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  4. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 221 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  5. American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    395 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying Taft

  6. Asarco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    86 F.3d 1401 (5th Cir. 1996)   Cited 22 times
    Finding of antiunion animus necessary to finding of section 8 violation

  7. Waterbury Hotel Management, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    314 F.3d 645 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that it was proper to infer from supervisor statements that "hiring decisions were motivated by anti-union animus"

  8. Amax Coal Co. v. N.L.R.B

    614 F.2d 872 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that "doing business under § 158(e) refers to a continuing business relationship, not to the sale of a facility

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Mar-Len Cabinets, Inc.

    659 F.2d 995 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 13 times
    In NLRB v. Mar-Len Cabinets, Inc., 659 F.2d 995 (9th Cir. 1981), we held that looking to the substance of an agreement is permissible when it "supports an inference of intent to frustrate agreement where... the entire spectrum of proposals put forward by a party is so consistently and predictably unpalatable to the other party that the proposer should know agreement is impossible."

  10. Nabors Trailers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    910 F.2d 268 (5th Cir. 1990)   Cited 5 times
    In Nabors Trailers, we faced quite similar facts to those now before us. There, the employer and the union met several times and were unable to agree on terms.

  11. Rule 807 - Residual Exception

    Fed. R. Evid. 807   Cited 1,556 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Requiring "sufficient guarantees of trustworthiness" under the residual exception to the hearsay rule