White Oak Manor

8 Cited authorities

Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
437 U.S. 556 (1978) Cited 196 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity
Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.
370 U.S. 9 (1962) Cited 206 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 358 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Prill v. N.L.R.B
755 F.2d 941 (D.C. Cir. 1985) Cited 80 times 3 Legal Analyses
In Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."
Prill v. N.L.R.B
835 F.2d 1481 (D.C. Cir. 1987) Cited 27 times 8 Legal Analyses
Recognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”
Media General Operations, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
394 F.3d 207 (4th Cir. 2005) Cited 7 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employee who called his employer a "racist," "b_____d," and "red-neck son-of-a-b___h" fell outside of § 7 because he committed acts "of such a serious character as to render [him] unfit for further service"
Brown Root, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
634 F.2d 816 (5th Cir. 1981) Cited 11 times
No. 79-3491. January 19, 1981. Powell, Brown Maverick, William L. Bedman, William A. Brown, Harry M. Thomson, Jr., Houston, Tex., for petitioner, cross-respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Diana Orantes Ceresi, Washington, D.C., for respondent, cross-petitioner. Petition to Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WISDOM, RUBIN and SAM D. JOHNSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The National Labor Relations Board found
Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest
26 U.S.C. § 6621 Cited 1,894 times 23 Legal Analyses
Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions

White Oak Manor

8 Cited authorities

Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

In Prill v. NLRB, 755 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C. Cir. 1985), the D.C. Circuit remanded a case to the agency because "a regulation [was] based on an incorrect view of applicable law."

Recognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”

Holding that an employee who called his employer a "racist," "b_____d," and "red-neck son-of-a-b___h" fell outside of § 7 because he committed acts "of such a serious character as to render [him] unfit for further service"

Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions

Holding that an employee who called his employer a "racist," "b___d," and "red-neck son-of-a-b_h" fell outside of § 7 because he committed acts "of such a serious character as to render [him] unfit for further service"