§

Wheeling Brake Block Manufacturing

08-CA-034764 (N.L.R.B. May. 31, 2007)
Wheeling Brake Block Manufacturing

15 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.

    691 F.2d 1117 (3d Cir. 1982)   Cited 339 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that joint employer situation exists only when "two or more employers exert significant control over the same employees . . . [where] they share or co-determine those matters governing essential terms and conditions of employment"

  3. Carter v. American Telephone Telegraph Co.

    385 U.S. 1008 (1967)   Cited 63 times

    No. 772. January 9, 1967. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. William VanDercreek for petitioners. Wayne Babler and Leroy Jeffers for American Telephone Telegraph Co. et al., and Spencer C. Relyea III for General Telephone Co. of the Southwest, respondents. Reported below: 365 F. 2d 486.

  4. Newspaper Guild of New York v. N.L.R.B

    261 F.3d 291 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 48 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that two subsidiary business of single newspaper did not share same business purpose, even though they had the same management, because the businesses had different strategic and financial goals

  5. Stardyne, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    41 F.3d 141 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that the Board's alter ego analysis involved a policy choice that is consistent with the Act

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Al Bryant, Inc.

    711 F.2d 543 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 62 times
    Finding that "the frequent interchange of craftsman" between the two companies is "substantial evidence to support" centralized labor relations control

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Hospital San Rafael, Inc.

    42 F.3d 45 (1st Cir. 1994)   Cited 39 times
    Describing the labor law alter ego doctrine, whereby an employer will be treated interchangeably with its predecessor for purposes of applying labor laws, typically when the new employer is “created by the owners of the first for the purpose of evading labor law responsibilities”

  8. J. Vallery Elec., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    337 F.3d 446 (5th Cir. 2003)   Cited 24 times
    Finding alter ego bound to collective bargaining agreement

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Emsing's Supermarket, Inc.

    872 F.2d 1279 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 32 times
    Granting enforcement of an NLRB order to an employer to cease and desist from unfair labor practices, including failing to make certain contractual payments after a CBA's expiration, and noting that "[a]n employer may not make changes in the terms and conditions of employment reflected in an expired [CBA; i]nstead, the employer must maintain the status quo after the expiration of a [CBA] until a new agreement is reached or until the parties bargain in good faith to impasse"

  10. Midwest Precision Heating v. N.L.R.B

    408 F.3d 450 (8th Cir. 2005)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 04-1862, 04-2056. Submitted: January 10, 2005. Filed: May 19, 2005. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Thomas M. Moore, argued, Kansas City, Missouri (S. Owen Griffin on the brief), for petitioners/cross-appellants. Steven B. Goldstein, argued, Washington, D.C. (Robert J. Englehart, Arthur F. Rosenfeld, John E. Higgins, Jr., John H. Ferguson, and Aileen A. Armstrong on the brief), for respondent/cross-petitioner. Before SMITH, HEANEY, and COLLOTON, Circuit

  11. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,588 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party