Weyerhaeuser Co.

6 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.
388 U.S. 26 (1967) Cited 322 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.
389 U.S. 375 (1967) Cited 233 times
In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.
Lodges 743 and 1746, Etc. v. United Aircraft
534 F.2d 422 (2d Cir. 1975) Cited 151 times
Holding that "[w]hether to award prejudgment interest in cases arising under federal law has in the absence of a statutory directive been placed in the sound discretion of the district courts"
Stone Boat Yard v. N.L.R.B
715 F.2d 441 (9th Cir. 1983) Cited 22 times
Concluding that knowledge possessed by union members was not attributable to union because there was no evidence in the record that the members were agents of the union
Giddings Lewis, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
675 F.2d 926 (7th Cir. 1982) Cited 16 times
Denying enforcement
Larkins v. N.L.R.B
596 F.2d 240 (7th Cir. 1979) Cited 8 times
Holding that plaintiff cannot escape responsibility for paying his union dues on the theory that once he executed the check-off documents his obligations shifted to the union

Weyerhaeuser Co.

6 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.

In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

Lodges 743 and 1746, Etc. v. United Aircraft

Holding that "[w]hether to award prejudgment interest in cases arising under federal law has in the absence of a statutory directive been placed in the sound discretion of the district courts"

Stone Boat Yard v. N.L.R.B

Concluding that knowledge possessed by union members was not attributable to union because there was no evidence in the record that the members were agents of the union

Giddings Lewis, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

Denying enforcement

Larkins v. N.L.R.B

Holding that plaintiff cannot escape responsibility for paying his union dues on the theory that once he executed the check-off documents his obligations shifted to the union